Accountability logics in disability service NPOs – Incorporating the role of service user advocacy in accountability and management control systems

Frank Conaty, Geraldine B. Robbins
{"title":"Accountability logics in disability service NPOs – Incorporating the role of service user advocacy in accountability and management control systems","authors":"Frank Conaty, Geraldine B. Robbins","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to contribute to a greater understanding of non-profit organization (NPO) management control systems (MCS) and accountability in organizations providing support service for capacity constrained service users. Specifically, the paper examines the role of MCS and accountability in supporting mission realization in NPOs providing services to people with intellectual disabilities and reflects on this in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThe research comprised a case study of four NPOs providing services to people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland conducted prior to the global COVID-19 pandemic. The study probed management's perceptions of stakeholders and examined the manner in which the design and use of MCS and accountability processes supported mission realization.FindingsService users were regarded as the least powerful stakeholder and consequently the least attended to in terms of MCS and accountability processes. The absence of relational and dialogical accountability with service users is not only central to maintaining this power asymmetry but also poses a threat to mission realization. These deficits can be addressed through the integration and monitoring of internal advocacy activities into MCS and accountability processes, which, on reflection, may also mitigate some of the negative consequences for service users of isolation from external support networks in times of crisis.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has opened up an area for enquiry – internal advocacy – heretofore not addressed in the management accounting literature, opening up a novel vein for future research. Such research could further examine the role of internal advocacy, drawing from and adding to the research in other support service domains. A number of objectives and questions might be considered: (1) probing the level of management recognition of the role of direct engagement in advocacy activities in supporting service user agency; (2) identifying with service users and management the nature and attributes of effective advocacy activities and practices; (3) questioning how such advocacy activities and practices might be reflected in MCS; (4) identifying what service user stakeholders regard as effective accountability to them in relation to their needs and objectives; and (5) assessing the impact on service user experience and on NPO mission realization of internal advocacy activities and the monitoring and review thereof through MCS. These suggestions for future research draw attention to aspects of support service delivery that have the potential to be profoundly influential on service outcomes.Practical implicationsA performance management model reflecting the identified need to incorporate internal advocacy mechanisms into organizational management control systems is proposed in an effort to increase accountability of NPOs to their core mission stakeholder – service users. This model may be of value to NPO management as they move from a medical-model of care to a rights-based model for service delivery in care settings.Social implicationsThe paper reflects the importance of listening to the voice of vulnerable service users in NPO care settings and proposes a mechanism for embedding internal advocacy in formal management control systems and accountability processes.Originality/valueIn proposing an “agency” supportive relational and dialogical accountability logic for such organizations, underpinned by “internal advocacy”, this research provides theoretical and practical insights for accountability processes and the design of MCS. The findings contribute empirically, not just to the NPO management and MCS literature but also to understanding the relational interaction of service users with service organizations, and what this means in supporting service user objectives and realization of organizational mission.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2021-5395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to contribute to a greater understanding of non-profit organization (NPO) management control systems (MCS) and accountability in organizations providing support service for capacity constrained service users. Specifically, the paper examines the role of MCS and accountability in supporting mission realization in NPOs providing services to people with intellectual disabilities and reflects on this in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThe research comprised a case study of four NPOs providing services to people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland conducted prior to the global COVID-19 pandemic. The study probed management's perceptions of stakeholders and examined the manner in which the design and use of MCS and accountability processes supported mission realization.FindingsService users were regarded as the least powerful stakeholder and consequently the least attended to in terms of MCS and accountability processes. The absence of relational and dialogical accountability with service users is not only central to maintaining this power asymmetry but also poses a threat to mission realization. These deficits can be addressed through the integration and monitoring of internal advocacy activities into MCS and accountability processes, which, on reflection, may also mitigate some of the negative consequences for service users of isolation from external support networks in times of crisis.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has opened up an area for enquiry – internal advocacy – heretofore not addressed in the management accounting literature, opening up a novel vein for future research. Such research could further examine the role of internal advocacy, drawing from and adding to the research in other support service domains. A number of objectives and questions might be considered: (1) probing the level of management recognition of the role of direct engagement in advocacy activities in supporting service user agency; (2) identifying with service users and management the nature and attributes of effective advocacy activities and practices; (3) questioning how such advocacy activities and practices might be reflected in MCS; (4) identifying what service user stakeholders regard as effective accountability to them in relation to their needs and objectives; and (5) assessing the impact on service user experience and on NPO mission realization of internal advocacy activities and the monitoring and review thereof through MCS. These suggestions for future research draw attention to aspects of support service delivery that have the potential to be profoundly influential on service outcomes.Practical implicationsA performance management model reflecting the identified need to incorporate internal advocacy mechanisms into organizational management control systems is proposed in an effort to increase accountability of NPOs to their core mission stakeholder – service users. This model may be of value to NPO management as they move from a medical-model of care to a rights-based model for service delivery in care settings.Social implicationsThe paper reflects the importance of listening to the voice of vulnerable service users in NPO care settings and proposes a mechanism for embedding internal advocacy in formal management control systems and accountability processes.Originality/valueIn proposing an “agency” supportive relational and dialogical accountability logic for such organizations, underpinned by “internal advocacy”, this research provides theoretical and practical insights for accountability processes and the design of MCS. The findings contribute empirically, not just to the NPO management and MCS literature but also to understanding the relational interaction of service users with service organizations, and what this means in supporting service user objectives and realization of organizational mission.
残障服务非营利组织的问责逻辑——在问责制和管理控制系统中纳入服务使用者倡导的作用
本文的目的是为了更好地理解非营利组织(NPO)管理控制系统(MCS)和向能力受限的服务用户提供支持服务的组织的问责制。具体而言,本文考察了MCS和问责制在支持向智障人士提供服务的非营利组织实现使命方面的作用,并在2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下对此进行了反思。设计/方法/方法该研究包括在全球COVID-19大流行之前对四个为爱尔兰智障人士提供服务的非营利组织进行的案例研究。该研究探讨了管理层对利益相关者的看法,并审查了MCS和问责制流程的设计和使用如何支持任务的实现。调查结果服务使用者被视为权力最小的利益相关者,因此在管理和问责制过程中受到的关注最少。缺乏与服务使用者的关系和对话问责不仅是维持这种权力不对称的核心,而且对任务的实现构成威胁。这些不足可以通过将内部宣传活动纳入管理监督和问责制进程并加以监测来解决,经过思考,这也可能减轻在危机时期与外部支助网络隔绝对服务使用者造成的一些负面影响。本研究开辟了一个研究领域——内部倡导——迄今为止在管理会计文献中尚未解决,为未来的研究开辟了一条新的脉络。这种研究可以进一步审查内部宣传的作用,借鉴和补充其他支助服务领域的研究。可以考虑一些目标和问题:(1)探讨管理层对直接参与支持服务用户机构的宣传活动的作用的认识程度;(2)识别服务使用者和管理层有效倡导活动和实践的性质和属性;(3)质疑这些倡导活动和做法如何在MCS中得到反映;(4)确定哪些服务使用者利益相关者认为是对他们的需求和目标的有效问责;(5)评估内部宣传活动对服务用户体验和NPO任务实现的影响,并通过MCS对其进行监测和审查。这些对未来研究的建议引起了人们对支持服务提供方面的关注,这些方面有可能对服务结果产生深远的影响。实际影响为了加强本国专业人员对其核心任务利益相关者- -服务使用者的问责制,提出了一种绩效管理模式,反映了将内部宣传机制纳入组织管理控制系统的确定需要。这种模式可能对非营利组织的管理有价值,因为它们正在从医疗模式转向基于权利的模式,以便在护理环境中提供服务。本文反映了倾听弱势服务使用者声音的重要性,并提出了一种将内部倡导嵌入正式管理控制系统和问责制过程的机制。原创性/价值本研究提出了一种以“内部倡导”为基础的“机构”支持关系和对话问责逻辑,为问责过程和MCS设计提供了理论和实践见解。研究结果不仅有助于NPO管理和MCS文献,而且有助于理解服务用户与服务组织之间的关系互动,以及这对支持服务用户目标和实现组织使命的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信