{"title":"The Wisdom of John Henry Newman","authors":"P. H. Schmidt","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2016.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At first glance the essays in this diverse collection on John Henry Newman may appear to have little in common aside from their primary subject. “Voice of Reason” contains an essay that focuses on the influence of Newman on T. S. Eliot (Oser), another that shows Newman to have been influenced by Jane Austen (Lindley), an essay that examines the significance of Newman’s famous motto cor ad cor loquitur in his argumentative writings (Bradshaw), one that seeks to add to our understanding of the function of reason in Newman’s conception of conscience (Aquino), and one that explores Newman’s apprenticeship as a writer of sermons by looking closely at his early sermon work as a clergyman in the Church of England (Poston). But on a second look a common thread will appear: each of these essays takes seriously the idea that Newman is a crucial intellectual in the history of nineteenth-century literature and that we need to continue the process of understanding his complex work. One danger to this understanding of Newman’s significance, aside from the general turn away from challenging, difficult older works, is the recent focus on Newman’s sanctification and potential sainthood, a focus that, while perhaps raising Newman’s profile among Catholics with little or no interest in his intellectual labors, may have had the effect of dampening interest in Newman among younger students of literature. Fortunately, as we shall see, there has been no corresponding decrease in interest among scholars. One of the effects of the dampening of popular interest has been that fewer and fewer readers know anything about him. Such readers would first learn of Newman from anthologies, but a quick look at the representation of Newman in anthologies tells a disheartening story. The first several editions of the Norton Anthology of English Literature contained twenty pages of Newman’s writings, including eleven pages from the Apologia Pro Vita Sua, Newman’s spiritual autobiography. In a 2012 edition of the Norton, the Newman selection has been reduced to eight pages from his Idea of a University, a series of lectures on higher education. In the Norton Major Authors Edition, Newman has disappeared entirely, as he has from the Broadview Anthology’s print versions.","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At first glance the essays in this diverse collection on John Henry Newman may appear to have little in common aside from their primary subject. “Voice of Reason” contains an essay that focuses on the influence of Newman on T. S. Eliot (Oser), another that shows Newman to have been influenced by Jane Austen (Lindley), an essay that examines the significance of Newman’s famous motto cor ad cor loquitur in his argumentative writings (Bradshaw), one that seeks to add to our understanding of the function of reason in Newman’s conception of conscience (Aquino), and one that explores Newman’s apprenticeship as a writer of sermons by looking closely at his early sermon work as a clergyman in the Church of England (Poston). But on a second look a common thread will appear: each of these essays takes seriously the idea that Newman is a crucial intellectual in the history of nineteenth-century literature and that we need to continue the process of understanding his complex work. One danger to this understanding of Newman’s significance, aside from the general turn away from challenging, difficult older works, is the recent focus on Newman’s sanctification and potential sainthood, a focus that, while perhaps raising Newman’s profile among Catholics with little or no interest in his intellectual labors, may have had the effect of dampening interest in Newman among younger students of literature. Fortunately, as we shall see, there has been no corresponding decrease in interest among scholars. One of the effects of the dampening of popular interest has been that fewer and fewer readers know anything about him. Such readers would first learn of Newman from anthologies, but a quick look at the representation of Newman in anthologies tells a disheartening story. The first several editions of the Norton Anthology of English Literature contained twenty pages of Newman’s writings, including eleven pages from the Apologia Pro Vita Sua, Newman’s spiritual autobiography. In a 2012 edition of the Norton, the Newman selection has been reduced to eight pages from his Idea of a University, a series of lectures on higher education. In the Norton Major Authors Edition, Newman has disappeared entirely, as he has from the Broadview Anthology’s print versions.
乍一看,这些关于约翰·亨利·纽曼的文章除了它们的主要主题外,似乎没有什么共同之处。“理性之声”包含了一篇文章,重点关注纽曼对t·s·艾略特(Oser)的影响,另一篇文章表明纽曼受到简·奥斯汀(Lindley)的影响,一篇文章考察了纽曼的著名格言“cor and cor loquitur”在他的议论文中的意义(Bradshaw),一篇文章试图增加我们对纽曼的良心概念中理性功能的理解(阿基诺)。另一本通过仔细观察纽曼早期在英国国教(波斯顿)担任牧师时的布道工作,探讨了他作为布道作家的学徒生涯。但再看一遍,就会发现一个共同的线索:每一篇文章都严肃地认为纽曼是19世纪文学史上一位至关重要的知识分子,我们需要继续理解他复杂的作品。对纽曼意义的这种理解的一个危险是,除了人们普遍回避具有挑战性、艰深难懂的老作品之外,最近对纽曼的圣化和潜在的圣徒身份的关注,这种关注可能会提高纽曼在天主教徒中的知名度,这些天主教徒对他的智力劳动很少或根本不感兴趣,但可能会抑制年轻文学学生对纽曼的兴趣。幸运的是,正如我们将看到的,学者们的兴趣并没有相应下降。公众对他的兴趣受到抑制的后果之一是,越来越少的读者对他有所了解。这样的读者首先会从选集中了解纽曼,但快速查看选集中的纽曼代表讲述了一个令人沮丧的故事。《诺顿英国文学选集》的前几个版本包含了20页纽曼的作品,其中11页来自纽曼的精神自传《为生命辩护》。在2012年版的《诺顿》中,纽曼的选集被缩减为八页,其中包括他关于高等教育的一系列演讲《大学理念》(Idea of a University)。在诺顿主要作者版中,纽曼完全消失了,就像他在Broadview选集的印刷版中一样。