Methodology to compare on-state breakdown loci of GaAs FET's

N. Ismail, N. Malbert, N. Labat, A. Touboul, J. Muraro
{"title":"Methodology to compare on-state breakdown loci of GaAs FET's","authors":"N. Ismail, N. Malbert, N. Labat, A. Touboul, J. Muraro","doi":"10.1109/ICM.2004.1434261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On-state breakdown loci of three technologies (power PHEMT, PHEMT and MESFET) have been measured using gate-current extraction techniques. We present a precise understanding of the correlation between the on-state breakdown voltage (BV on-state) locus and the reverse Igs-Vgs characteristics. From the comparison of Igs-Vgs characteristics, this study has allowed establishing a methodology to compare BV-on state of the devices under test. We have found that for technologies with impact ionization occurring at pinch off, such as the PHEMT technology with a high leakage gate current, the on-state breakdown locus presents a pronounced \"exponential\" shape. On the contrary, a technology with high impact ionization component in the gate current, such as the PPHEMT technology, presents a shape of the on-state breakdown locus rather \"hyperbolic\". We assess that technologies with impact ionization occurring at pinch off such as the PHEMT and PPHEMT present a more \"hyperbolic\" shape of the on-state breakdown locus than technologies with impact ionization occurring in open channel regime such as the MESFET.","PeriodicalId":359193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. The 16th International Conference on Microelectronics, 2004. ICM 2004.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. The 16th International Conference on Microelectronics, 2004. ICM 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICM.2004.1434261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

On-state breakdown loci of three technologies (power PHEMT, PHEMT and MESFET) have been measured using gate-current extraction techniques. We present a precise understanding of the correlation between the on-state breakdown voltage (BV on-state) locus and the reverse Igs-Vgs characteristics. From the comparison of Igs-Vgs characteristics, this study has allowed establishing a methodology to compare BV-on state of the devices under test. We have found that for technologies with impact ionization occurring at pinch off, such as the PHEMT technology with a high leakage gate current, the on-state breakdown locus presents a pronounced "exponential" shape. On the contrary, a technology with high impact ionization component in the gate current, such as the PPHEMT technology, presents a shape of the on-state breakdown locus rather "hyperbolic". We assess that technologies with impact ionization occurring at pinch off such as the PHEMT and PPHEMT present a more "hyperbolic" shape of the on-state breakdown locus than technologies with impact ionization occurring in open channel regime such as the MESFET.
比较GaAs场效应晶体管的导通击穿位点的方法
利用栅极电流提取技术测量了三种技术(功率PHEMT、PHEMT和MESFET)的导通击穿位点。我们提出了导通击穿电压(BV导通状态)轨迹与反向Igs-Vgs特性之间的关系的精确理解。通过Igs-Vgs特性的比较,本研究建立了一种比较被测器件BV-on状态的方法。我们发现,对于在掐断发生冲击电离的技术,例如具有高漏极电流的PHEMT技术,导通击穿轨迹呈现明显的“指数”形状。相反,在栅极电流中具有高冲击电离分量的技术,如PPHEMT技术,其导通击穿轨迹呈“双曲线”形状。我们评估了在掐断发生冲击电离的技术,如PHEMT和PHEMT,比在开放通道发生冲击电离的技术,如MESFET,呈现出更“双曲线”形状的on-state击穿轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信