The Electoral–Constituency Model of Party Personnel

M. Shugart, M. E. Bergman, Cory L. Struthers, E. Krauss, Robert J. Pekkanen
{"title":"The Electoral–Constituency Model of Party Personnel","authors":"M. Shugart, M. E. Bergman, Cory L. Struthers, E. Krauss, Robert J. Pekkanen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192897053.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter develops the electoral–constituency model of party personnel. Under this model, parties deploy their personnel according to their ability to draw votes within specific electoral districts or to specific competing candidates of the party. The chapter derives testable premises, grounded in a two-dimensional characterization of electoral systems: (1) the extent to which they shape a party’s seat maximization through dependence on the geographical location of votes; and (2) the extent of a party’s dependence on “personal votes” of individual candidates. Nationwide proportional representation (PR) versus systems with many electoral districts define the first dimension, while the second dimension is characterized by differences between systems with closed party lists and those employing a single nontransferable vote (SNTV). The chapter discusses how different single-tier and mixed-member systems generate different tradeoffs between parties’ use of the expertise and electoral–constituency models. In particular, the electoral–constituency model suggests that parties allocate members from safe districts differently from those elected in swing/marginal districts. The chapter presents data on the parties covered in the book according to variables such as the margin of electoral victory and population density of districts represented.","PeriodicalId":284163,"journal":{"name":"Party Personnel Strategies","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Personnel Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897053.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter develops the electoral–constituency model of party personnel. Under this model, parties deploy their personnel according to their ability to draw votes within specific electoral districts or to specific competing candidates of the party. The chapter derives testable premises, grounded in a two-dimensional characterization of electoral systems: (1) the extent to which they shape a party’s seat maximization through dependence on the geographical location of votes; and (2) the extent of a party’s dependence on “personal votes” of individual candidates. Nationwide proportional representation (PR) versus systems with many electoral districts define the first dimension, while the second dimension is characterized by differences between systems with closed party lists and those employing a single nontransferable vote (SNTV). The chapter discusses how different single-tier and mixed-member systems generate different tradeoffs between parties’ use of the expertise and electoral–constituency models. In particular, the electoral–constituency model suggests that parties allocate members from safe districts differently from those elected in swing/marginal districts. The chapter presents data on the parties covered in the book according to variables such as the margin of electoral victory and population density of districts represented.
政党人员的选举选区模式
本章发展了政党人员的选举选区模式。在这种模式下,政党根据自己在特定选区或党内特定竞争候选人的拉票能力部署人员。本章以选举制度的二维特征为基础,推导出可检验的前提:(1)它们通过依赖选票的地理位置来塑造政党席位最大化的程度;(2)政党对个别候选人“个人选票”的依赖程度。全国比例代表制(PR)与多个选区的制度定义了第一个维度,而第二个维度的特点是政党名单封闭的制度与单一不可转让选票(SNTV)的制度之间的差异。本章讨论了不同的单层和混合成员系统如何在政党使用专业知识和选举-选区模型之间产生不同的权衡。特别是,选举-选区模型表明,政党分配来自安全地区的成员与在摇摆/边缘地区当选的成员不同。这一章根据选举胜利的差额和所代表地区的人口密度等变量介绍了书中所涉及的政党的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信