The Analysis of Age and Experience of Incident Victims: A Case Study in Japan to Improve HSE Training Programs

H. Shimoda
{"title":"The Analysis of Age and Experience of Incident Victims: A Case Study in Japan to Improve HSE Training Programs","authors":"H. Shimoda","doi":"10.2118/195385-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How can a company improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its HSE (Health, Safety, and Environment) training? This paper, based on an analysis of the victims of incidents over the last ten years, discusses strategic allocation of training resources to high-risk groups of workers.\n The scope of the study encompassed domestic operations of Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd., including contractors, involving incidents resulting in Medical Treatment Cases or more severe cases that took place between 2008 and 2017. The victims’ ages and years of experience were extracted from sixty-eight incident reports.\n This study revealed that the median age of the victims was 35.5 years and median length of experience was 6.0 years. Half of the victims were either 35 years old or younger or their experience level was less than 6 years. Furthermore, the correlations between the victims’ ages and years of experience indicated that the younger and the less experienced workforce accounted for 43% of the total incidents.\n A comparison with government statistics implies that the frequency of incidents is higher in workers who are younger and less experienced. According to Japan's Labor Force Survey, the population of employed persons aged 15 to 34 years accounts for only 29% of the total Japanese working-age population. Moreover, Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry reported a trend that 42% of the victims of mining incidents across the country had less than five years of experience, which reaffirmed the trend that prevails across the industry.\n Providing more intensive and/or frequent training to the young and the less experienced workforce must be a resource-efficient approach to improve HSE performance. Targeted training will be more effective and beneficial for participants than \"one size fits all\" HSE awareness sessions. HSE planners in organizations should carry out studies based on their company's incident databases to obtain specific results that will be useful for the further evolution of HSE training programs.","PeriodicalId":425264,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195385-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can a company improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its HSE (Health, Safety, and Environment) training? This paper, based on an analysis of the victims of incidents over the last ten years, discusses strategic allocation of training resources to high-risk groups of workers. The scope of the study encompassed domestic operations of Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd., including contractors, involving incidents resulting in Medical Treatment Cases or more severe cases that took place between 2008 and 2017. The victims’ ages and years of experience were extracted from sixty-eight incident reports. This study revealed that the median age of the victims was 35.5 years and median length of experience was 6.0 years. Half of the victims were either 35 years old or younger or their experience level was less than 6 years. Furthermore, the correlations between the victims’ ages and years of experience indicated that the younger and the less experienced workforce accounted for 43% of the total incidents. A comparison with government statistics implies that the frequency of incidents is higher in workers who are younger and less experienced. According to Japan's Labor Force Survey, the population of employed persons aged 15 to 34 years accounts for only 29% of the total Japanese working-age population. Moreover, Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry reported a trend that 42% of the victims of mining incidents across the country had less than five years of experience, which reaffirmed the trend that prevails across the industry. Providing more intensive and/or frequent training to the young and the less experienced workforce must be a resource-efficient approach to improve HSE performance. Targeted training will be more effective and beneficial for participants than "one size fits all" HSE awareness sessions. HSE planners in organizations should carry out studies based on their company's incident databases to obtain specific results that will be useful for the further evolution of HSE training programs.
事故受害者的年龄和经历分析:以日本为例,以改善HSE培训计划
公司如何提高HSE(健康、安全和环境)培训的有效性和效率?本文在分析近十年事故受害者的基础上,探讨了培训资源对高危工人群体的战略分配。该研究的范围包括日本石油勘探有限公司(Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd)的国内业务,包括承包商,涉及2008年至2017年期间发生的导致医疗案件或更严重案件的事件。这些受害者的年龄和经历摘自68份事故报告。该研究显示,受害者的中位年龄为35.5岁,中位经验长度为6.0岁。一半的受害者年龄在35岁以下或者经验不足6年。此外,受害者的年龄和经验之间的相关性表明,年轻和经验不足的劳动力占总事件的43%。与政府统计数据的比较表明,在年轻和缺乏经验的工人中,事故发生的频率更高。根据日本的劳动力调查,15至34岁的就业人口仅占日本劳动年龄人口总数的29%。此外,日本经济产业省(Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry)报告了一种趋势,即全国42%的采矿事故受害者的工作经验不足5年,这再次证实了整个行业普遍存在的趋势。为年轻和经验不足的员工提供更密集和/或频繁的培训,必须是提高HSE绩效的资源高效方法。对参与者来说,有针对性的培训比“一刀切”的HSE意识课程更有效、更有益。组织中的HSE规划者应该根据公司的事故数据库进行研究,以获得对HSE培训计划进一步发展有用的具体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信