New and Old Authoritarianism in a Comparative Perspective

J. Wiatr
{"title":"New and Old Authoritarianism in a Comparative Perspective","authors":"J. Wiatr","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvdf08xx.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The third wave of democratization, unlike the first and the second, has not been followed by the reverse wave. However, in several countries (Russia, Belarus, Turkey, Hungary, Poland) democratically elected leaders interpret democracy narrowly, as the rule of majority only. Other conditions for democratic government (the rule of law, protecting human rights) are ignored. Such system of government differs from the authoritarian model (as defined by Juan J. Linz), and can best be called «new authoritarianism». Poland is a special case because, while after the presidential and parliamentary elections of 2015 authoritarian practices became common, the hold on power by the ruling party («Law and Justice») is relatively weak. Future development of Polish politics depends mostly on the next parliamentary (2019) and presidential (2020) elections.","PeriodicalId":313362,"journal":{"name":"New Authoritarianism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Authoritarianism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf08xx.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The third wave of democratization, unlike the first and the second, has not been followed by the reverse wave. However, in several countries (Russia, Belarus, Turkey, Hungary, Poland) democratically elected leaders interpret democracy narrowly, as the rule of majority only. Other conditions for democratic government (the rule of law, protecting human rights) are ignored. Such system of government differs from the authoritarian model (as defined by Juan J. Linz), and can best be called «new authoritarianism». Poland is a special case because, while after the presidential and parliamentary elections of 2015 authoritarian practices became common, the hold on power by the ruling party («Law and Justice») is relatively weak. Future development of Polish politics depends mostly on the next parliamentary (2019) and presidential (2020) elections.
比较视角下的新旧威权主义
与第一次和第二次民主化浪潮不同,第三次民主化浪潮之后并没有出现反向浪潮。然而,在一些国家(俄罗斯、白俄罗斯、土耳其、匈牙利、波兰),民主选举的领导人将民主狭隘地解释为多数人的统治。民主政府的其他条件(法治、保护人权)被忽视了。这种政府体制不同于威权主义模式(如胡安·j·林茨所定义的),最好被称为“新威权主义”。波兰是一个特例,因为在2015年总统和议会选举之后,专制做法变得普遍,执政党(“法律与正义”)对权力的控制相对较弱。波兰政治的未来发展主要取决于下一届议会(2019年)和总统(2020年)选举。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信