The Quest to be the Best-In-Value Clinical Laboratory

G. Sharma
{"title":"The Quest to be the Best-In-Value Clinical Laboratory","authors":"G. Sharma","doi":"10.1093/crival/vaw018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"![Graphic][1] \n\nOur nation's healthcare system is undergoing a massive transformation and reorganization. Along with changing regulations and delivery models, the average patient is more connected to and involved in his or her care, more and more providers are utilizing electronic medical records to coordinate treatment, and insurance companies are leveraging analytical tools to study the pools of subscribers covered.\n\nAmidst this change, a slow but steady movement towards “smart” and “value‐added” care is underway. Pathologists and clinical laboratory administrators realize that the transactional fee‐for‐service (FFS) model is on the decline, while value‐based care and testing is on the rise. The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Henry Ford Health System, Detroit (PALM HFHS) has taken innovative steps in placing and presenting the value proposition of its laboratory services.\n\nIn the traditional healthcare delivery model, patient care is delivered through a physician‐led team. All services are transactional and often delivered in silos (clinic, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, etc.), as requested by the clinical team. Critics of this model have often termed this “sickcare,” rather than healthcare, as the entire delivery mechanism seems to be focused on treating patients rather than keeping populations healthy.\n\n![Graphic][2] \n\n![Graphic][3] \n\nHowever, with looming shortfalls in the ability of our nation to fund its burgeoning healthcare costs, recent legislation and healthcare reforms have forced a reconfiguration of this model from an episodic and individualcentric approach to a long‐term and population‐centric approach. The latter is a preventive model of care, where the emphasis is in keeping the patient out of the hospital, and delivering care in the most seamless and cost‐ effective manner.\n\nThis will also help in addressing the shortage in the trained and skilled personnel needed to sustain the existing care model. In the future, providers and hospitals will be reimbursed and incentivized (and penalized) based on multiple quality …\n\n [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif\n [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif\n [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif","PeriodicalId":384814,"journal":{"name":"Critical Values","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crival/vaw018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

![Graphic][1] Our nation's healthcare system is undergoing a massive transformation and reorganization. Along with changing regulations and delivery models, the average patient is more connected to and involved in his or her care, more and more providers are utilizing electronic medical records to coordinate treatment, and insurance companies are leveraging analytical tools to study the pools of subscribers covered. Amidst this change, a slow but steady movement towards “smart” and “value‐added” care is underway. Pathologists and clinical laboratory administrators realize that the transactional fee‐for‐service (FFS) model is on the decline, while value‐based care and testing is on the rise. The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Henry Ford Health System, Detroit (PALM HFHS) has taken innovative steps in placing and presenting the value proposition of its laboratory services. In the traditional healthcare delivery model, patient care is delivered through a physician‐led team. All services are transactional and often delivered in silos (clinic, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, etc.), as requested by the clinical team. Critics of this model have often termed this “sickcare,” rather than healthcare, as the entire delivery mechanism seems to be focused on treating patients rather than keeping populations healthy. ![Graphic][2] ![Graphic][3] However, with looming shortfalls in the ability of our nation to fund its burgeoning healthcare costs, recent legislation and healthcare reforms have forced a reconfiguration of this model from an episodic and individualcentric approach to a long‐term and population‐centric approach. The latter is a preventive model of care, where the emphasis is in keeping the patient out of the hospital, and delivering care in the most seamless and cost‐ effective manner. This will also help in addressing the shortage in the trained and skilled personnel needed to sustain the existing care model. In the future, providers and hospitals will be reimbursed and incentivized (and penalized) based on multiple quality … [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
追求成为最有价值的临床实验室
[1]我国的医疗体系正在经历大规模的转型和重组。随着法规和交付模式的变化,普通患者与他或她的护理之间的联系和参与程度越来越高,越来越多的医疗服务提供者正在利用电子医疗记录来协调治疗,保险公司正在利用分析工具来研究所覆盖的用户群。在这种变化中,一种缓慢但稳定的“智能”和“增值”护理正在进行中。病理学家和临床实验室管理人员意识到,交易收费服务(FFS)模式正在下降,而基于价值的护理和检测正在上升。底特律亨利福特卫生系统(PALM HFHS)的病理学和实验室医学系在放置和展示其实验室服务的价值主张方面采取了创新措施。在传统的医疗保健服务模式中,患者护理是通过医生领导的团队提供的。根据临床团队的要求,所有服务都是事务性的,并且通常在竖井(诊所、实验室、放射科、药房等)中交付。批评这种模式的人通常将其称为“疾病护理”,而不是医疗保健,因为整个提供机制似乎侧重于治疗患者,而不是保持人群健康。[图][2][图][3]然而,随着我国为迅速增长的医疗成本提供资金的能力日益不足,最近的立法和医疗改革迫使这一模式从以偶然性和个人为中心的方法重新配置为以长期和人口为中心的方法。后者是一种预防性护理模式,其重点是不让患者住院,并以最无缝和最具成本效益的方式提供护理。这也将有助于解决维持现有护理模式所需的训练有素和熟练人员短缺的问题。未来,医疗服务提供者和医院将根据多重质量获得补偿和奖励(和惩罚)…[1]:/embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信