{"title":"The Testament of Time – The Apocalypse of John and the recapitulatio of Time according to Giorgio Agamben","authors":"G. Agamben","doi":"10.1515/9783110597745-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Giorgio Agamben is one of the most widely received and most important philosophers of our time. His philosophy can be understood as a continuation of Foucault’s archaeology of knowledge. Accordingly, Agamben analyses the genesis of the essential occidental concepts, categories and constellations in the context of their political and noetic significance for the present age. Similar to Foucault, this endeavour includes an impetus that is critical of knowledge and society. Beyond Foucault Agamben systematically deals with the influence of religious categories on the constitution of occidental power, but also its subversive potential. Among Agamben’s writings especially his Homo-sacer-project, which has mostly been translated into English by now, and his book The Time that Remains (Il tempo che resta)1 have to be mentioned. In Il tempo che resta Agamben particularly investigates apocalyptic thought and the correspondent concepts of time on the basis of an interpretation of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Both aspects are a key to a critique of systems of power and their structures of representation. This text also focusses on these questions. The first part of this essay provides a definition of the position of current concepts of time, the second part traces key categories of Agamben who responds to today’s virtualisations with the concept of messianity. The third part will attempt to confront Agamben’s change of perspective with observations from the Bible in which the problem of a critical vision of historical superpowers and their representation systems becomes the decisive criterion for an apocalypticism of history.","PeriodicalId":126034,"journal":{"name":"Cultures of Eschatology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultures of Eschatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110597745-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Giorgio Agamben is one of the most widely received and most important philosophers of our time. His philosophy can be understood as a continuation of Foucault’s archaeology of knowledge. Accordingly, Agamben analyses the genesis of the essential occidental concepts, categories and constellations in the context of their political and noetic significance for the present age. Similar to Foucault, this endeavour includes an impetus that is critical of knowledge and society. Beyond Foucault Agamben systematically deals with the influence of religious categories on the constitution of occidental power, but also its subversive potential. Among Agamben’s writings especially his Homo-sacer-project, which has mostly been translated into English by now, and his book The Time that Remains (Il tempo che resta)1 have to be mentioned. In Il tempo che resta Agamben particularly investigates apocalyptic thought and the correspondent concepts of time on the basis of an interpretation of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Both aspects are a key to a critique of systems of power and their structures of representation. This text also focusses on these questions. The first part of this essay provides a definition of the position of current concepts of time, the second part traces key categories of Agamben who responds to today’s virtualisations with the concept of messianity. The third part will attempt to confront Agamben’s change of perspective with observations from the Bible in which the problem of a critical vision of historical superpowers and their representation systems becomes the decisive criterion for an apocalypticism of history.
乔治·阿甘本是我们这个时代最受欢迎、最重要的哲学家之一。他的哲学可以理解为福柯知识考古学的延续。因此,阿甘本分析了西方基本概念、范畴和星座在当代的政治和思想意义的起源。与福柯相似,这种努力包含了一种对知识和社会批判的动力。在福柯之外,阿甘本系统地论述了宗教范畴对西方权力构成的影响,以及它的颠覆潜力。在阿甘本的作品中,特别是他的homo -sacer计划,到目前为止大部分都被翻译成英文,还有他的书《剩下的时间》(Il tempo che resta),我不得不提一下。在《我的节奏,我的休息》中,阿甘本在对保罗致罗马人书信的解释基础上,特别研究了启示录思想和相应的时间概念。这两个方面都是批判权力体系及其代表结构的关键。本文也关注这些问题。本文的第一部分提供了当前时间概念位置的定义,第二部分追溯了阿甘本的关键类别,他用弥赛亚的概念回应了今天的虚拟化。第三部分将试图通过对《圣经》的观察来面对阿甘本观点的转变,其中对历史超级大国及其代表体系的批判性看法问题成为历史启示论的决定性标准。