Usability of electronic death registration system: A case study of heuristic evaluation

F. Jeddi, Razieh Farrahi, Sara Chopannejad
{"title":"Usability of electronic death registration system: A case study of heuristic evaluation","authors":"F. Jeddi, Razieh Farrahi, Sara Chopannejad","doi":"10.4103/iahs.iahs_86_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study was conducted to identify gaps in the user interface design of Iran's Electronic Death Registration System (National Registry) using the heuristic method. Materials and Methods: Five independent evaluators assessed the user interface using the heuristic evaluation. Problems were reassessed in the presence of all evaluators, and similar cases were merged, and a single list of unique problems was eventually prepared. By re-evaluating the system, the evaluators determined and categorized the severity of the problem in five domains, including no problem (zero point), a cosmetic problem (1 point), a minor problem (2 points), a major problem (3 points), and a catastrophic problem (4 points). The data were then analyzed in an excel sheet using descriptive statistics. Findings: Forty-two unique problems were identified. The “recognition rather than recall” principle with ten problems (23.8% of all cases) had the most frequent problem, while the “help and documentation” principle with one problem (2.4% of all cases) had the least frequency but the highest mean severity (4). Conclusion: The results of the heuristic evaluation of the electronic death registration system indicated that a large portion of the problems in this system was classified under the minor category, which primarily indicates the good usability of this system. However, this system suffers from several usability problems. Therefore, it could be concluded that considering the national-level use of this system, it has problems that could be resolved through meeting system design principles and standards.","PeriodicalId":160562,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Health Sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iahs.iahs_86_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to identify gaps in the user interface design of Iran's Electronic Death Registration System (National Registry) using the heuristic method. Materials and Methods: Five independent evaluators assessed the user interface using the heuristic evaluation. Problems were reassessed in the presence of all evaluators, and similar cases were merged, and a single list of unique problems was eventually prepared. By re-evaluating the system, the evaluators determined and categorized the severity of the problem in five domains, including no problem (zero point), a cosmetic problem (1 point), a minor problem (2 points), a major problem (3 points), and a catastrophic problem (4 points). The data were then analyzed in an excel sheet using descriptive statistics. Findings: Forty-two unique problems were identified. The “recognition rather than recall” principle with ten problems (23.8% of all cases) had the most frequent problem, while the “help and documentation” principle with one problem (2.4% of all cases) had the least frequency but the highest mean severity (4). Conclusion: The results of the heuristic evaluation of the electronic death registration system indicated that a large portion of the problems in this system was classified under the minor category, which primarily indicates the good usability of this system. However, this system suffers from several usability problems. Therefore, it could be concluded that considering the national-level use of this system, it has problems that could be resolved through meeting system design principles and standards.
电子死亡登记系统的可用性:启发式评估的案例研究
目的:本研究采用启发式方法确定伊朗电子死亡登记系统(国家登记处)用户界面设计中的差距。材料与方法:五名独立评估者采用启发式评估法对用户界面进行评估。在所有评价人员在场的情况下对问题进行了重新评估,并合并了类似的案例,最后编制了一份独特问题的单一清单。通过重新评估系统,评估人员确定并将问题的严重性分为五个领域,包括没有问题(零分),一个外观问题(1分),一个次要问题(2分),一个主要问题(3分)和一个灾难性问题(4分)。然后使用描述性统计在excel表格中对数据进行分析。发现:确定了42个独特的问题。“识别而不是回忆”原则有10个问题(占所有病例的23.8%)是最常见的问题,而“帮助和文档”原则有1个问题(占所有病例的2.4%)出现的频率最少,但平均严重程度最高(4)。对电子死亡登记系统的启发式评价结果表明,该系统存在的大部分问题属于次要问题,这主要表明该系统具有良好的可用性。然而,这个系统存在一些可用性问题。因此,可以得出结论,考虑到该系统在国家层面的使用,它存在一些问题,可以通过满足系统设计原则和标准来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信