Developing a structured set of standards (software engineering)

R. Stevens, A. Scheffer
{"title":"Developing a structured set of standards (software engineering)","authors":"R. Stevens, A. Scheffer","doi":"10.1109/SESS.1993.263969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standards need to be short, coherent, readable and easy to change. In practice, these goals are hard to achieve, because the underlying information is complex and interrelated. Common mistakes in developing standards include over-large documents, unreadable style, mixed levels of abstraction, lack of structure across sets of documents, and repetition of information across different standards. The European Space Agency (ESA) has been developing a structured set of software engineering standards, and the experience is abstracted to help future standards writers. Many principles were followed subconsciously while developing the ESA standard, but have become clearer in retrospect. A systematic approach should make for a better product with less effort.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":145783,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1993 Software Engineering Standards Symposium","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1993 Software Engineering Standards Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1993.263969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standards need to be short, coherent, readable and easy to change. In practice, these goals are hard to achieve, because the underlying information is complex and interrelated. Common mistakes in developing standards include over-large documents, unreadable style, mixed levels of abstraction, lack of structure across sets of documents, and repetition of information across different standards. The European Space Agency (ESA) has been developing a structured set of software engineering standards, and the experience is abstracted to help future standards writers. Many principles were followed subconsciously while developing the ESA standard, but have become clearer in retrospect. A systematic approach should make for a better product with less effort.<>
开发一套结构化的标准(软件工程)
标准需要简短、连贯、易读且易于更改。在实践中,这些目标很难实现,因为底层信息是复杂且相互关联的。开发标准的常见错误包括过大的文档、不可读的样式、混合的抽象级别、文档集之间缺乏结构以及不同标准之间信息的重复。欧洲空间局(ESA)一直在开发一套结构化的软件工程标准,这些经验被抽象出来,以帮助未来的标准编写者。在制定ESA标准的过程中,潜意识中遵循了许多原则,但回顾起来,这些原则变得更加清晰。系统化的方法可以让你事半功倍地做出更好的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信