{"title":"ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION OF TOURISM COMPETITIVE MODELS TO TOURISM DESTINATIONS","authors":"Saidi Wasi Jackson","doi":"10.18510/IJTHR.2018.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses and evaluates theories and models of tourism competitiveness particularly those of Crouch and Ritchie (1999), Dwyer and Kim (2003) and World Economic Forum (2018). Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005) the models enable and tries to enlighten more on how they facilitate the understanding and application of tourism competitiveness. World Travel and Tourism Council (2018) competitiveness in the travel and tourism industry is widely preached however, there is no uniform understanding and application of the concepts of competitiveness (Andrades-Caldito L Sánchez-Rivero, M. & Pulido-Fernández J. 2013). \nWorld Travel and Tourism Council (2018) evidently, there are many competitive variations among the top and advanced tourism destinations in the world. Austria is on position one in tourism infrastructural and products competitiveness, France is number one on tourists' visitations but the United States of America and China is number one on receipts/income realized from tourism. \nThis clearly shows that if the models were perfect and uniformly applied then only one destination could have been number one in all aspects of visitation, infrastructural development, and income generated from the tourism industry. This clearly shows that there is a need for fresh research and development of the models to suffice the variations in the situation. The analysis, evaluation, and comparison of models is based on the research methodology, application (practice), variables used, assumptions and generalizations","PeriodicalId":132566,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18510/IJTHR.2018.514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The article discusses and evaluates theories and models of tourism competitiveness particularly those of Crouch and Ritchie (1999), Dwyer and Kim (2003) and World Economic Forum (2018). Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005) the models enable and tries to enlighten more on how they facilitate the understanding and application of tourism competitiveness. World Travel and Tourism Council (2018) competitiveness in the travel and tourism industry is widely preached however, there is no uniform understanding and application of the concepts of competitiveness (Andrades-Caldito L Sánchez-Rivero, M. & Pulido-Fernández J. 2013).
World Travel and Tourism Council (2018) evidently, there are many competitive variations among the top and advanced tourism destinations in the world. Austria is on position one in tourism infrastructural and products competitiveness, France is number one on tourists' visitations but the United States of America and China is number one on receipts/income realized from tourism.
This clearly shows that if the models were perfect and uniformly applied then only one destination could have been number one in all aspects of visitation, infrastructural development, and income generated from the tourism industry. This clearly shows that there is a need for fresh research and development of the models to suffice the variations in the situation. The analysis, evaluation, and comparison of models is based on the research methodology, application (practice), variables used, assumptions and generalizations
本文讨论和评价了旅游竞争力的理论和模型,特别是克劳奇和里奇(1999)、德怀尔和金(2003)和世界经济论坛(2018)的理论和模型。Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D.(2005),这些模型能够并试图启发更多关于它们如何促进对旅游竞争力的理解和应用。世界旅游和旅游理事会(2018)竞争力在旅游和旅游业被广泛宣传,然而,竞争力的概念没有统一的理解和应用(Andrades-Caldito L Sánchez-Rivero, M. & Pulido-Fernández J. 2013)。显然,世界顶级和先进的旅游目的地之间存在许多竞争差异。奥地利在旅游基础设施和产品竞争力方面排名第一,法国在游客访问量方面排名第一,但美国和中国在旅游收入方面排名第一。这清楚地表明,如果模型是完美的和统一的应用,那么只有一个目的地可以在游客、基础设施发展和旅游业收入的各个方面排名第一。这清楚地表明,有必要对模型进行新的研究和开发,以满足情况的变化。模型的分析、评价和比较是基于研究方法、应用(实践)、使用的变量、假设和概括