Total Quality Management Practices in Malaysian and Pakistani Public Universities using SWOT Analysis

Waqas Mahmood, Siti Noor Ismail
{"title":"Total Quality Management Practices in Malaysian and Pakistani Public Universities using SWOT Analysis","authors":"Waqas Mahmood, Siti Noor Ismail","doi":"10.54183/jssr.v2i4.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of every nation is dependent on the quality of education; quality education is a key priority across the world. Total Quality Management (TQM) is a strategy used to improve educational quality at the university level. Furthermore, a survey of literature on comprehensive quality management in the education sector was conducted. The primary goal of this article is to analyse the extent of TQM practises in Malaysian and Pakistani universities, as well as to compare and contrast the institutions. The population consisted of teaching instructors from public institutions, and 346 responses were selected as a sample using a stratified random selection procedure. The data was gathered using a survey approach. The data were analysed with SPSS-25. To establish the extent of TQM procedures, descriptive analysis was used, ANOVA analysis was used to compare the universities, and an independent sample t-test was used for SWOT analysis. The findings indicated that public institutions in Malaysia and Pakistan prioritise the implementation of TQM strategies that increase educational quality. Furthermore, the study determined that Malaysian higher education institutions use overall quality management techniques better than Pakistani universities.","PeriodicalId":320360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Sciences Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v2i4.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growth of every nation is dependent on the quality of education; quality education is a key priority across the world. Total Quality Management (TQM) is a strategy used to improve educational quality at the university level. Furthermore, a survey of literature on comprehensive quality management in the education sector was conducted. The primary goal of this article is to analyse the extent of TQM practises in Malaysian and Pakistani universities, as well as to compare and contrast the institutions. The population consisted of teaching instructors from public institutions, and 346 responses were selected as a sample using a stratified random selection procedure. The data was gathered using a survey approach. The data were analysed with SPSS-25. To establish the extent of TQM procedures, descriptive analysis was used, ANOVA analysis was used to compare the universities, and an independent sample t-test was used for SWOT analysis. The findings indicated that public institutions in Malaysia and Pakistan prioritise the implementation of TQM strategies that increase educational quality. Furthermore, the study determined that Malaysian higher education institutions use overall quality management techniques better than Pakistani universities.
运用SWOT分析的马来西亚和巴基斯坦公立大学全面质量管理实践
每个国家的发展都依赖于教育质量;优质教育是全世界的一个关键优先事项。全面质量管理(TQM)是一种用于提高大学教育质量的策略。此外,对教育部门全面质量管理的文献进行了调查。本文的主要目的是分析马来西亚和巴基斯坦大学全面质量管理实践的程度,并对这些机构进行比较和对比。人口由来自公共机构的教学教师组成,采用分层随机选择程序选择346份回复作为样本。数据是用调查方法收集的。采用SPSS-25对数据进行分析。为了确定TQM程序的程度,使用描述性分析,使用方差分析对各大学进行比较,使用独立样本t检验进行SWOT分析。研究结果表明,马来西亚和巴基斯坦的公共机构优先实施提高教育质量的全面质量管理战略。此外,该研究确定马来西亚高等教育机构比巴基斯坦大学更好地使用整体质量管理技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信