When AI Meets AI - Artificial Intelligence Competition

Rain Chen, Y. Hsiao, Mei-Wei Yang
{"title":"When AI Meets AI - Artificial Intelligence Competition","authors":"Rain Chen, Y. Hsiao, Mei-Wei Yang","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the breakthrough of image identify technology, website administrators could apply artificial intelligence (AI) technology to assist reviewing the pictures. This study has collected the artworks that had been removed by Facebook as racy. By taking the well-known works of art as examples, this study expected to explore the differences between Google AI and Microsoft AI in making image judgments. This study has applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the test, and Multidimensional Scaling to show the distribution of research samples. The results showed that: (1) Google AI was more extensive than Microsoft AI in the number of items for forecasting and special topics. (2) For the three indicators, including Adult, Racy, and Violence, only Racy showed significant difference (p=0.021). With the continuous development of AI, simulating judgment was close to that of human and it should be the main trend of AI in the future. The judgment of human on many things may be subjective. On the one hand, the development of AI needs to overcome such subjectivity, and on the other hand, it must be able to simulate the human thinking pattern as much as possible. It would be a dilemma for AI, and it would also be a challenge for AI in the future.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the breakthrough of image identify technology, website administrators could apply artificial intelligence (AI) technology to assist reviewing the pictures. This study has collected the artworks that had been removed by Facebook as racy. By taking the well-known works of art as examples, this study expected to explore the differences between Google AI and Microsoft AI in making image judgments. This study has applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the test, and Multidimensional Scaling to show the distribution of research samples. The results showed that: (1) Google AI was more extensive than Microsoft AI in the number of items for forecasting and special topics. (2) For the three indicators, including Adult, Racy, and Violence, only Racy showed significant difference (p=0.021). With the continuous development of AI, simulating judgment was close to that of human and it should be the main trend of AI in the future. The judgment of human on many things may be subjective. On the one hand, the development of AI needs to overcome such subjectivity, and on the other hand, it must be able to simulate the human thinking pattern as much as possible. It would be a dilemma for AI, and it would also be a challenge for AI in the future.
当AI遇上AI -人工智能竞赛
随着图像识别技术的突破,网站管理员可以应用人工智能(AI)技术来辅助审查图片。这项研究收集了被Facebook认为不雅而下架的艺术品。本研究希望以知名艺术作品为例,探讨谷歌AI与Microsoft AI在图像判断方面的差异。本研究采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行检验,并采用多维尺度来显示研究样本的分布。结果表明:(1)谷歌人工智能在预测项目数量和专题数量上比Microsoft人工智能更广泛。(2)在Adult、Racy、Violence三个指标中,只有Racy存在显著性差异(p=0.021)。随着人工智能的不断发展,模拟判断已经接近人类的判断,这应该是未来人工智能的主要趋势。人类对许多事情的判断可能是主观的。一方面,人工智能的发展需要克服这种主观性,另一方面,它必须能够尽可能地模拟人类的思维模式。这将是人工智能的两难选择,也是未来人工智能面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信