Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement Guideline in Nursing Studies: Analytical Review

Ahmed Lateef Alkhaqani
{"title":"Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement Guideline in Nursing Studies: Analytical Review","authors":"Ahmed Lateef Alkhaqani","doi":"10.36321/kjns.vi20212.2052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), also called randomized clinical trials, are regarded as the most reputable source of evidence that provides the best guide of the effectiveness of nursing interventions during the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) period and, however, yet in the nursing literature, has not been evaluated the quality of reporting RCT. Practical and conceptual challenges to the EBP nursing movement have been. The limited available scientific evidence on the efficacy of many nursing practices is one of the serious concerns. EBP requests that study evidence from RCTs and other forms of intervention studies that are still limited in nursing be synthesized. On the other hand, comprehensive evaluations, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews that are performed in nursing are also that limited when compared to other disciplines, such as psychology and medicine.\nAims of the study: The study aimed at applying the declaration of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to nursing and healthcare provider studies and adequacy of the published reports adhere to the statement and how the content of the published RCTs is being influenced by the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of reporting RCT.\nMethodology: Analytical review of literature based on previous studies and reviews derived of international publishers such as (Scopus, PubMed, and Medline) databases concerning Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement Guideline. The collection of data was conducted from 24 November 2020 to 10 February 2021. These studies were collected and filtered according to the specific criteria. Also, was used keywords such as CONSORT, nursing studies, evidence-based practice, evidence-based nursing practice, randomized controlled trial, as well as the articles by the National Library of Medicine, which provided valid and documented data of global research and epidemiology.\nConclusion: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is rooted in solid evidence that the assumption (science-based nursing) in patient care should be supported by sound evidence. It is important that nursing professionals use the CONSORT statement to review, publish, and utilize their reports of nursing clinical and gather the best evidence to support their clinical practice of use and their decision-making.\nRecommendations: The authors should consult supervisors and biostatisticians experts early when formulating the study and analysis protocol to improve the quality of reporting the trials in nursing studies. Determine primary and secondary outcomes in advance, preferably in a published protocol. Use adequate checklists reporting, e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE).","PeriodicalId":404923,"journal":{"name":"Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36321/kjns.vi20212.2052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), also called randomized clinical trials, are regarded as the most reputable source of evidence that provides the best guide of the effectiveness of nursing interventions during the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) period and, however, yet in the nursing literature, has not been evaluated the quality of reporting RCT. Practical and conceptual challenges to the EBP nursing movement have been. The limited available scientific evidence on the efficacy of many nursing practices is one of the serious concerns. EBP requests that study evidence from RCTs and other forms of intervention studies that are still limited in nursing be synthesized. On the other hand, comprehensive evaluations, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews that are performed in nursing are also that limited when compared to other disciplines, such as psychology and medicine. Aims of the study: The study aimed at applying the declaration of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to nursing and healthcare provider studies and adequacy of the published reports adhere to the statement and how the content of the published RCTs is being influenced by the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of reporting RCT. Methodology: Analytical review of literature based on previous studies and reviews derived of international publishers such as (Scopus, PubMed, and Medline) databases concerning Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement Guideline. The collection of data was conducted from 24 November 2020 to 10 February 2021. These studies were collected and filtered according to the specific criteria. Also, was used keywords such as CONSORT, nursing studies, evidence-based practice, evidence-based nursing practice, randomized controlled trial, as well as the articles by the National Library of Medicine, which provided valid and documented data of global research and epidemiology. Conclusion: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is rooted in solid evidence that the assumption (science-based nursing) in patient care should be supported by sound evidence. It is important that nursing professionals use the CONSORT statement to review, publish, and utilize their reports of nursing clinical and gather the best evidence to support their clinical practice of use and their decision-making. Recommendations: The authors should consult supervisors and biostatisticians experts early when formulating the study and analysis protocol to improve the quality of reporting the trials in nursing studies. Determine primary and secondary outcomes in advance, preferably in a published protocol. Use adequate checklists reporting, e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE).
综合报告试验标准(CONSORT)声明指南在护理研究中的应用:分析性回顾
背景:随机对照试验(RCT),也称为随机临床试验,被认为是最有信誉的证据来源,为循证实践(EBP)时期护理干预措施的有效性提供了最好的指导,然而,在护理文献中,尚未对报告RCT的质量进行评估。实践和概念上的挑战,以EBP护理运动已经。关于许多护理实践的有效性,现有的科学证据有限,这是一个严重的问题。EBP要求综合来自随机对照试验和其他形式的干预研究的证据,这些证据在护理方面仍然有限。另一方面,与其他学科(如心理学和医学)相比,在护理中进行的综合评估、元分析和系统评价也很有限。研究目的:本研究旨在将报告试验综合标准(CONSORT)声明应用于护理和医疗保健提供者研究,发表的报告是否充分遵守该声明,以及采用CONSORT对报告性随机对照试验质量的影响如何影响已发表的随机对照试验的内容。方法:基于先前的研究和来自国际出版商如(Scopus, PubMed和Medline)数据库关于合并标准报告试验(CONSORT)声明指南的综述的文献分析性综述。数据收集于2020年11月24日至2021年2月10日进行。这些研究是根据特定的标准收集和筛选的。同时,使用CONSORT、护理研究、循证实践、循证护理实践、随机对照试验等关键词,以及美国国家医学图书馆的文章,这些文章提供了全球研究和流行病学的有效文献数据。结论:循证实践(EBP)根植于确凿的证据,病人护理的假设(科学护理)应该得到充分的证据支持。重要的是,护理专业人员使用CONSORT声明来审查、发布和利用他们的护理临床报告,并收集最好的证据来支持他们的临床实践和决策。建议:作者在制定研究和分析方案时应尽早咨询主管和生物统计专家,以提高护理研究试验报告的质量。提前确定主要和次要结局,最好在已公布的方案中确定。使用适当的核对表进行报告,例如,合并试验报告标准(CONSORT),加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信