Africa’s Continental Free Trade and Sustainable Development: An Economic Assessment

Jonathan D. Quartey
{"title":"Africa’s Continental Free Trade and Sustainable Development: An Economic Assessment","authors":"Jonathan D. Quartey","doi":"10.48100/merj.2023.258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quest for Africa’s development breakthrough appears to be closely related to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission of Africa believes the move could solve chronic poverty and joblessness prevailing on the continent. However, the benefit of hindsight reveals limits set by the laws of thermodynamics on the extent to which economic activities can be most beneficial to humanity. The motivation to expand trade thrives on energy for extraction, production and consumption, each of which yields undesirable waste products. The need for sustainable development has been a response to the limits imposed by excessive waste, stretching environmental carrying capacity to the breaking point. Thus, in order not to repeat the development errors of the past, Africa’s Continental Free Trade Area needs to ascertain the extent and cost of resultant environmental damage. Clearly, AfCFTA is yet to consider such effects. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, should be a reminder of how devastating a collision between economic activity and the natural environment can be. Existing studies on AfCFTA have so far been restricted to quantifying the effects of tariff reductions, non-tariff barriers and trade facilitation. This study, however, assesses the outcomes of the efforts being made to achieve the goals of AfCFTA, from an environmental economics analytical framework, in line with tenets of sustainable development. It employs data mainly from the World Bank and AfCFTA Secretariat to analyze the welfare effects of AfCFTA through resultant deforestation, solid waste management and climate change adaptation. The study found the resulting environmental damage to be US$ 744.71 billion, which far exceeds the projected AfCFTA benefits of US$450 billion to be realized by 2035. Thus, in its current form, AfCFTA will reduce the economic welfare of Africa by at least US$294.71 billion by 2035. While in the formative stages, AfCFTA will be better served if stakeholders can pay attention to the call for a fully operational plan to offset the impending environmental damage, which cannot be taken for granted if Africa wants sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":162032,"journal":{"name":"Management & Economics Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48100/merj.2023.258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quest for Africa’s development breakthrough appears to be closely related to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission of Africa believes the move could solve chronic poverty and joblessness prevailing on the continent. However, the benefit of hindsight reveals limits set by the laws of thermodynamics on the extent to which economic activities can be most beneficial to humanity. The motivation to expand trade thrives on energy for extraction, production and consumption, each of which yields undesirable waste products. The need for sustainable development has been a response to the limits imposed by excessive waste, stretching environmental carrying capacity to the breaking point. Thus, in order not to repeat the development errors of the past, Africa’s Continental Free Trade Area needs to ascertain the extent and cost of resultant environmental damage. Clearly, AfCFTA is yet to consider such effects. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, should be a reminder of how devastating a collision between economic activity and the natural environment can be. Existing studies on AfCFTA have so far been restricted to quantifying the effects of tariff reductions, non-tariff barriers and trade facilitation. This study, however, assesses the outcomes of the efforts being made to achieve the goals of AfCFTA, from an environmental economics analytical framework, in line with tenets of sustainable development. It employs data mainly from the World Bank and AfCFTA Secretariat to analyze the welfare effects of AfCFTA through resultant deforestation, solid waste management and climate change adaptation. The study found the resulting environmental damage to be US$ 744.71 billion, which far exceeds the projected AfCFTA benefits of US$450 billion to be realized by 2035. Thus, in its current form, AfCFTA will reduce the economic welfare of Africa by at least US$294.71 billion by 2035. While in the formative stages, AfCFTA will be better served if stakeholders can pay attention to the call for a fully operational plan to offset the impending environmental damage, which cannot be taken for granted if Africa wants sustainable development.
非洲大陆自由贸易与可持续发展:经济评估
寻求非洲发展突破似乎与非洲大陆自由贸易区(AfCFTA)密切相关。非洲经济委员会认为,此举可以解决非洲大陆普遍存在的长期贫困和失业问题。然而,后见之明的好处揭示了热力学定律对经济活动对人类最有益的程度设定的限制。扩大贸易的动机在于能源的开采、生产和消费,每一个过程都会产生不受欢迎的废物。可持续发展的需要是对过度浪费所造成的限制作出的反应,过度浪费使环境承载能力达到了极限。因此,为了不重复过去的发展错误,非洲大陆自由贸易区需要确定由此造成的环境破坏的程度和代价。显然,非洲自贸协定尚未考虑这些影响。然而,2019冠状病毒病大流行应该提醒我们,经济活动与自然环境之间的冲突会造成多么严重的破坏。迄今为止,关于非洲大陆自贸协定的现有研究仅限于量化关税削减、非关税壁垒和贸易便利化的影响。然而,本研究从环境经济学分析框架出发,根据可持续发展原则,评估了为实现非洲自贸区目标所作努力的成果。报告主要采用来自世界银行和非洲自贸区秘书处的数据,分析了非洲自贸区在森林砍伐、固体废物管理和气候变化适应等方面的福利效应。该研究发现,由此造成的环境损害为7447.1亿美元,远远超过了预计到2035年实现的《非洲自由贸易区》4500亿美元的效益。因此,以目前的形式,到2035年,非洲自贸协定将使非洲的经济福利减少至少2947.1亿美元。在形成阶段,如果利益攸关方能够关注对全面运作计划的呼吁,以抵消即将到来的环境破坏,那么非洲大陆自由贸易区将得到更好的服务。如果非洲想要可持续发展,这就不能被视为理所当然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信