{"title":"Improving interoperability by using a three data model approach","authors":"L. Russell","doi":"10.1109/IMS.1991.153707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving interoperability in multidatabase systems is unlikely to be achieved without a full understanding of component database systems' semantics. The full semantics of many database applications cannot be understood without combining the database's data semantics from a logical model of data L with data semantics embedded in a file-system model F and in a physical storage model P. To prove this assertion, the authors use proof by contradiction on its negation. Two examples are provided to demonstrate false positives, multidatabases with identical logical models L which are not interoperable, one due to differences in F and the other in P. One example is provided to demonstrate a missing value, an interoperable database without an explicit logical model L, but rich in semantics desirable from its file-system model F. A technique is proposed for describing how semantics embedded in L, F and P can be combined.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":376969,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMS.1991.153707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Achieving interoperability in multidatabase systems is unlikely to be achieved without a full understanding of component database systems' semantics. The full semantics of many database applications cannot be understood without combining the database's data semantics from a logical model of data L with data semantics embedded in a file-system model F and in a physical storage model P. To prove this assertion, the authors use proof by contradiction on its negation. Two examples are provided to demonstrate false positives, multidatabases with identical logical models L which are not interoperable, one due to differences in F and the other in P. One example is provided to demonstrate a missing value, an interoperable database without an explicit logical model L, but rich in semantics desirable from its file-system model F. A technique is proposed for describing how semantics embedded in L, F and P can be combined.<>