The Library's Quality Management System and Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Lesson from Southeast Emerging Educational Hub

C. A. Taib, Ari Warokka, H. Hilman
{"title":"The Library's Quality Management System and Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Lesson from Southeast Emerging Educational Hub","authors":"C. A. Taib, Ari Warokka, H. Hilman","doi":"10.5171/2012.871760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the national vision 2020’s implementation programs, the establishment of a national Quality Assurance system focusing on the quality of the programs offered in terms of the general criteria of the structure and process of higher education is timely. In relating to the program, this paper aims to explore the efforts and other issues associated with the development and implementation of quality assurance in higher education due to its role as a service organization, which is required to enhance their quality of services. One of the important pillars determining the quality of higher-education service delivery is the library’s quality management system. By using 46 public universities’ libraries as the main sample, this study tested three hypotheses that are related to the nature of quality management practices by individual construct, as well as by aggregation value, and to what extent the difference to the numbers of staff and the type of organization will influence the quality management practices. We employed mean value and oneway analysis ANOVA as the research method to solve the questions. The validity of the constructs is measured using factor analysis, and its reliability is measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Our study results revealed that the study sample perceived those constructs were important to maintain service quality to its customer. The study also informs that the number of staff and the type of organization do not influence at all on the library’s quality management system. In other words, the awareness and spirit to play an important role in achieving excellent service to its customer is the main platform over the number of staff and the type of organization.","PeriodicalId":187676,"journal":{"name":"Communications of the IBIMA","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications of the IBIMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.871760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

As one of the national vision 2020’s implementation programs, the establishment of a national Quality Assurance system focusing on the quality of the programs offered in terms of the general criteria of the structure and process of higher education is timely. In relating to the program, this paper aims to explore the efforts and other issues associated with the development and implementation of quality assurance in higher education due to its role as a service organization, which is required to enhance their quality of services. One of the important pillars determining the quality of higher-education service delivery is the library’s quality management system. By using 46 public universities’ libraries as the main sample, this study tested three hypotheses that are related to the nature of quality management practices by individual construct, as well as by aggregation value, and to what extent the difference to the numbers of staff and the type of organization will influence the quality management practices. We employed mean value and oneway analysis ANOVA as the research method to solve the questions. The validity of the constructs is measured using factor analysis, and its reliability is measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Our study results revealed that the study sample perceived those constructs were important to maintain service quality to its customer. The study also informs that the number of staff and the type of organization do not influence at all on the library’s quality management system. In other words, the awareness and spirit to play an important role in achieving excellent service to its customer is the main platform over the number of staff and the type of organization.
高等教育图书馆质量管理体系与质量保证——以东南新兴教育枢纽为例
作为国家“2020愿景”的实施方案之一,根据高等教育的结构和过程的一般标准,建立以提供的课程质量为重点的国家质量保证体系是及时的。与此相关,本文旨在探讨高等教育作为一个服务性组织,为提高其服务质量,在发展和实施质量保证方面所做的努力和其他问题。图书馆的质量管理体系是决定高等教育服务质量的重要支柱之一。本研究以46所公立大学图书馆为主要样本,检验了个体结构与质量管理实践性质的三个假设,以及人员数量和组织类型的差异对质量管理实践的影响程度。我们采用均值和单因素方差分析作为研究方法来解决问题。构念的效度采用因子分析来衡量,信度采用Cronbach’s alpha来衡量。我们的研究结果表明,研究样本认为这些结构对保持对客户的服务质量很重要。该研究还表明,员工数量和组织类型对图书馆的质量管理体系根本没有影响。换句话说,在实现对客户的优质服务中发挥重要作用的意识和精神是超越员工数量和组织类型的主要平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信