{"title":"Varia: Beauty and/(n)or Truth: A (Hermeneutic) Rhetoric of the Aesthetic","authors":"E. Douka-Kabitoglou","doi":"10.54664/wusw7936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Tell all the Truth but tell it slant –,” a line of poetry by the nineteenth-century American poet Emily Dickinson can be used as a signpost for this article, which attempts a hermeneutic regress from the postmodern to the archaic, in search of a rhetoric for the aesthetic. In this textual tour, some of the master narratives of our culture examining various versions of the story of beauty and truth are visited, and more specifically (always in backward motion), the work of the postmodern theorists Paul de Man and Jacques Derrida, the German philosophers Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger, the English Romantic poet John Keats, the Greek philosophers Plato and Parmenides, and, last but not least, the Greek poet Sappho. Paul de Man, the “sad” patriarch of postmodernism, who engaged deeply with the cardinal problem of the truth of poetry and its relation to reality, contests that all language is figurative and rhetorical, and hence unable to represent the real. De Man demystifies aesthetics exploding a whole tradition of aesthetic theory based on the ontology of language, that is, the relation between “word” and “thing.” Along the same lines, the deconstructive critique of Jacques Derrida supports that linguistic figurality contaminates not only literature but philosophy as well, playing mimetic games of seduction that limit reality to a textual frame. On the far side of deconstruction, the hermeneutic theory of Hans- Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger give figurality an overwhelming power by establishing a rhetoric of ontology and presence. Heidegger’s radical reformulation of truth as aletheia and its conjunction with beauty, not only reflects the romantic identification of “beauty is truth,” as best expressed by the poet John Keats, but also points back to Plato who “aporetically” devoted a lifetime to a search for the beautiful and the true, coming up with multiple and contradictory views. As we move into archaic times, the whispering voice of Parmenides unexpectedly recommends the rhetoric of persuasion as the way to truth, while Sappho, celebrating presence and union, employs an erotic rhetoric that names not only human, but natural and divine encounters of beauty and truth.","PeriodicalId":124585,"journal":{"name":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VTU Review: Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/wusw7936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
“Tell all the Truth but tell it slant –,” a line of poetry by the nineteenth-century American poet Emily Dickinson can be used as a signpost for this article, which attempts a hermeneutic regress from the postmodern to the archaic, in search of a rhetoric for the aesthetic. In this textual tour, some of the master narratives of our culture examining various versions of the story of beauty and truth are visited, and more specifically (always in backward motion), the work of the postmodern theorists Paul de Man and Jacques Derrida, the German philosophers Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger, the English Romantic poet John Keats, the Greek philosophers Plato and Parmenides, and, last but not least, the Greek poet Sappho. Paul de Man, the “sad” patriarch of postmodernism, who engaged deeply with the cardinal problem of the truth of poetry and its relation to reality, contests that all language is figurative and rhetorical, and hence unable to represent the real. De Man demystifies aesthetics exploding a whole tradition of aesthetic theory based on the ontology of language, that is, the relation between “word” and “thing.” Along the same lines, the deconstructive critique of Jacques Derrida supports that linguistic figurality contaminates not only literature but philosophy as well, playing mimetic games of seduction that limit reality to a textual frame. On the far side of deconstruction, the hermeneutic theory of Hans- Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger give figurality an overwhelming power by establishing a rhetoric of ontology and presence. Heidegger’s radical reformulation of truth as aletheia and its conjunction with beauty, not only reflects the romantic identification of “beauty is truth,” as best expressed by the poet John Keats, but also points back to Plato who “aporetically” devoted a lifetime to a search for the beautiful and the true, coming up with multiple and contradictory views. As we move into archaic times, the whispering voice of Parmenides unexpectedly recommends the rhetoric of persuasion as the way to truth, while Sappho, celebrating presence and union, employs an erotic rhetoric that names not only human, but natural and divine encounters of beauty and truth.
19世纪美国诗人艾米莉·狄金森(Emily Dickinson)的一句诗“倾向性地说出所有的真相”可以作为本文的路标,本文试图从后现代到古代的解释学回归,寻找一种美学的修辞。在这段文字之旅中,我们考察了一些关于美与真的故事的不同版本,更具体地说(总是以反向运动的方式),包括后现代理论家保罗·德曼和雅克·德里达、德国哲学家汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔和马丁·海德格尔、英国浪漫主义诗人约翰·慈、希腊哲学家柏拉图和巴门尼德,以及最后但并非最不重要的希腊诗人萨福的作品。后现代主义的“悲伤”元老保罗·德曼(Paul de Man)深入研究了诗歌的真实性及其与现实的关系这一基本问题,他认为所有的语言都是比喻和修辞的,因此无法代表现实。德曼揭开了美学的神秘面纱,打破了整个以语言本体论为基础的美学理论传统,即“词”与“物”的关系。沿着同样的思路,雅克·德里达的解构主义批判认为,语言的具象性不仅污染了文学,也污染了哲学,它玩着诱惑的模仿游戏,将现实限制在一个文本框架内。在解构主义的另一边,伽达默尔和海德格尔的解释学理论通过建立本体论和在场的修辞,赋予具象以压倒一切的力量。海德格尔将真理激进地重新表述为真理,并将其与美结合起来,不仅反映了诗人约翰·济慈(John Keats)对“美即真理”的浪漫主义认同,而且还指向了柏拉图,他“唯心地”毕生致力于寻找美与真,提出了多种矛盾的观点。当我们进入远古时代时,巴门尼德的低语出人意料地推荐了说服的修辞作为通往真理的途径,而萨福,庆祝存在和团结,采用了一种情爱的修辞,不仅提到了人类,而且提到了自然和神圣的美与真理的相遇。