{"title":"Outphasing power amplifiers","authors":"T. Barton, Paolo Enrico de Falco","doi":"10.1049/pbcs071g_ch4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents a comprehensive introduction to the outphasing architecture, with particular focus on nonisolating outphasing techniques. When efficiency at output power back-off is required, the outphasing technique presents a significant advantage over conventional single-ended PAs. This performance benefit comes, as is typical in efficiency enhancement architectures, at the expense of complexity, linearity, and bandwidth. Nonetheless, when digital predistortion and the associated complexity can be tolerated, outphasing is clearly beneficial for systems using high peak-to-average power ratio signals. A direct comparison to other efficiency enhancement techniques is made complicated by the large trade-off space in efficiency, linearity, complexity, and so on. It is of interest, however, to consider a comparison to the popular Doherty PA (DPA). The main difference between these two techniques lies in how the branch PAs are operated. In outphasing systems, the branch PAs are driven identically, with both branch PAs operating in saturation in the outphasing regime and in back off at low output power levels. In Doherty PAs, on the other hand, in the higherpower regime only the main PA is operated at full voltage swing, while in back-off the auxiliary PA is completely off. As a result, at high output powers the outphasing PA has theoretically higher achievable efficiency, and better utilization of the device periphery at low power levels.","PeriodicalId":241838,"journal":{"name":"Radio Frequency and Microwave Power Amplifiers. Volume 2: Efficiency and Linearity Enhancement Techniques","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radio Frequency and Microwave Power Amplifiers. Volume 2: Efficiency and Linearity Enhancement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/pbcs071g_ch4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter presents a comprehensive introduction to the outphasing architecture, with particular focus on nonisolating outphasing techniques. When efficiency at output power back-off is required, the outphasing technique presents a significant advantage over conventional single-ended PAs. This performance benefit comes, as is typical in efficiency enhancement architectures, at the expense of complexity, linearity, and bandwidth. Nonetheless, when digital predistortion and the associated complexity can be tolerated, outphasing is clearly beneficial for systems using high peak-to-average power ratio signals. A direct comparison to other efficiency enhancement techniques is made complicated by the large trade-off space in efficiency, linearity, complexity, and so on. It is of interest, however, to consider a comparison to the popular Doherty PA (DPA). The main difference between these two techniques lies in how the branch PAs are operated. In outphasing systems, the branch PAs are driven identically, with both branch PAs operating in saturation in the outphasing regime and in back off at low output power levels. In Doherty PAs, on the other hand, in the higherpower regime only the main PA is operated at full voltage swing, while in back-off the auxiliary PA is completely off. As a result, at high output powers the outphasing PA has theoretically higher achievable efficiency, and better utilization of the device periphery at low power levels.
本章全面介绍了分阶段架构,特别关注非隔离的分阶段技术。当需要输出功率回退的效率时,同相技术比传统的单端放大器具有显著的优势。在效率增强体系结构中,这种性能优势是以牺牲复杂性、线性度和带宽为代价的。尽管如此,当数字预失真和相关的复杂性可以容忍时,失相对于使用高峰值平均功率比信号的系统显然是有益的。由于在效率、线性度、复杂性等方面存在很大的权衡空间,因此与其他效率增强技术的直接比较变得复杂。然而,将其与流行的Doherty PA (DPA)进行比较是有趣的。这两种技术之间的主要区别在于如何操作分支pa。在同相系统中,支路放大器的驱动是相同的,两个支路放大器在同相状态下工作在饱和状态,在低输出功率水平下工作在关闭状态。另一方面,在Doherty PA中,在更高功率的情况下,只有主PA在全电压摆幅下工作,而在回退时,辅助PA完全关闭。因此,在高输出功率下,同相PA理论上具有更高的可实现效率,并且在低功率水平下更好地利用器件外围。