Postawa wobec religii a relacje dorosłych z ich rodzicami w okresie dzieciństwa, doświadczenia z rówieśnikami oraz wybrane wymiary osobowości

Zbigniew Łoś
{"title":"Postawa wobec religii a relacje dorosłych z ich rodzicami w okresie dzieciństwa, doświadczenia z rówieśnikami oraz wybrane wymiary osobowości","authors":"Zbigniew Łoś","doi":"10.15633/9788374389327.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the results of seven empirical studies on connections between attitudes towards religion in adults and variables representing important socialization experiences from childhood to adolescence, and current traits of personality. The attitude towards religion was defined as a bipolar psychological dimension: skepticism-religiousness, briefly called religiosity. Childhood experiences were characterized by the mutual feelings of the child and the parents and the level of parental control. The adolescence experiences were based on experiences from individual roles in peer groups. The current personality traits were described according to the three factor-models: Eysenck’s, Big Five, and HEXACO. Personality measurement was provided by EPQ-Rs, NEOI-FFI and HEXACO-60 questionnaires, and the remaining variables by own questionnaires (Opi for religiosity, PDwR for experiences with parents and AB for experiences from peer groups). The researches were exploratory by cross-sectional design. Seven samples of different sizes (from 140 to 390 persons) and in different age ranges were examined: a part from ages 17 to 26, and the others from 18 to 65. Results showed that connections between religiosity and experiences from family or peer-groups were poor and unsystematic. Adult religiosity in some samples has tendency to have a positive connections with the level of feelings between the child his/ her and parents, and a negative connections with active roles in peer groups. Relationships between religiosity and personality traits are rather weak, but coincide with the ones signaled by other researchers, i.e. religiosity has positive connections with such factors as Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Honesty. According to the empirical data and on the basis of his own model of psychological organization, the author suggests that skepticism-religiousness as one of the characteristics of the world-view is shaped autonomously, and is not dependent on socialization experiences and basic personality traits. Conditions of religiosity should be searched rather in individual identity, lifestyle, other traits of worldview, and in specific subjective experiences.","PeriodicalId":361874,"journal":{"name":"Konteksty religijności i rodziny","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konteksty religijności i rodziny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/9788374389327.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper presents the results of seven empirical studies on connections between attitudes towards religion in adults and variables representing important socialization experiences from childhood to adolescence, and current traits of personality. The attitude towards religion was defined as a bipolar psychological dimension: skepticism-religiousness, briefly called religiosity. Childhood experiences were characterized by the mutual feelings of the child and the parents and the level of parental control. The adolescence experiences were based on experiences from individual roles in peer groups. The current personality traits were described according to the three factor-models: Eysenck’s, Big Five, and HEXACO. Personality measurement was provided by EPQ-Rs, NEOI-FFI and HEXACO-60 questionnaires, and the remaining variables by own questionnaires (Opi for religiosity, PDwR for experiences with parents and AB for experiences from peer groups). The researches were exploratory by cross-sectional design. Seven samples of different sizes (from 140 to 390 persons) and in different age ranges were examined: a part from ages 17 to 26, and the others from 18 to 65. Results showed that connections between religiosity and experiences from family or peer-groups were poor and unsystematic. Adult religiosity in some samples has tendency to have a positive connections with the level of feelings between the child his/ her and parents, and a negative connections with active roles in peer groups. Relationships between religiosity and personality traits are rather weak, but coincide with the ones signaled by other researchers, i.e. religiosity has positive connections with such factors as Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Honesty. According to the empirical data and on the basis of his own model of psychological organization, the author suggests that skepticism-religiousness as one of the characteristics of the world-view is shaped autonomously, and is not dependent on socialization experiences and basic personality traits. Conditions of religiosity should be searched rather in individual identity, lifestyle, other traits of worldview, and in specific subjective experiences.
本文介绍了七项关于成人宗教态度与代表童年到青春期重要社会化经历的变量和当前人格特征之间关系的实证研究结果。对宗教的态度被定义为一种双重心理维度:怀疑-虔诚,简称宗教虔诚。童年经历的特点是孩子和父母的相互感受以及父母的控制水平。青少年的经历是基于在同伴群体中个人角色的经历。目前的人格特征是根据三个因素模型来描述的:艾森克,大五,和HEXACO。人格测量采用EPQ-Rs、NEOI-FFI和HEXACO-60问卷,其余变量采用自填问卷(Opi为宗教虔诚度,PDwR为与父母相处的经历,AB为来自同伴群体的经历)。采用横断面设计进行探索性研究。七个不同规模的样本(从140到390人)和不同的年龄范围进行了检查:一部分年龄在17到26岁之间,另一部分年龄在18到65岁之间。结果表明,宗教信仰与来自家庭或同伴群体的经历之间的联系很差,而且没有系统。在一些样本中,成人的宗教信仰倾向于与孩子(他/她)与父母之间的情感水平有积极的联系,而与同龄人群体中的积极角色有消极的联系。宗教虔诚度与人格特质的关系较弱,但与其他研究结果一致,即宗教虔诚度与宜人性、尽责性和诚实性等因素呈正相关。作者根据实证资料,在自己的心理组织模型的基础上,提出了怀疑论-宗教性作为世界观特征之一是自主形成的,不依赖于社会化经验和基本人格特征。宗教虔诚的条件应该在个人身份、生活方式、世界观的其他特征以及具体的主观体验中进行搜索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信