Comparative measurements of two partial discharge measurements used for form wound coils/bars as quality assurance tests

S. Cherukupalli, G. Halldorson, C. Tan
{"title":"Comparative measurements of two partial discharge measurements used for form wound coils/bars as quality assurance tests","authors":"S. Cherukupalli, G. Halldorson, C. Tan","doi":"10.1109/EEIC.2001.965755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several utilities both in Canada and in the USA have been using commercial on-line partial discharge (PD) systems as on-line monitoring tools. Partial discharge tests have been used historically to characterize bars/coils that have been sent to Powertech Laboratories for voltage endurance and thermal cycling tests so that the bars that displayed the highest PD quantities were subjected to voltage endurance tests. Utilities are now beginning to specify the limits for PD magnitudes and other related PD quantities as a quality assurance measure in their technical specifications for large motors and hydrogenerators. There appears to be confusion as to what are the reasonable limits for these quantities and whether or not these limits make practical sense. Since Powertech has had the unique opportunity to examine several insulation designs over the last decade this paper is an early attempt to document the current levels of PD quantities that are being measured on bars/coils being manufactured with modern insulation systems. No attempt has been made to correlate these quantities with its performance on voltage endurance (VE) test times but this work is ongoing. Several bars from different manufacturers were subjected to PD measurements at their normal line-to-ground voltage. These PD measurements were made using Powertech's classical PD system as well as a commercial system. One significant difference was that the PHA system uses pico-coulomb to represent charge magnitude while PDA system uses millivolt. Laboratory calibration was done to correlate these discharge magnitudes. Results showed that if the discharge magnitudes and the number of PD pulses were small both the classical and the commercial system gave similar PD responses. On the other hand if the discharge rate (number of pulses per second) was large the classical PD measurement system tended to saturate. Historically, when such saturation occurred during measurements with the classical PD system, measurements were repeated at a lower test voltage (for example 0.8 pu). Subsequent dissections of samples that exhibited such high PD showed the presence of a large number of voids in the groundwall insulation.","PeriodicalId":228071,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings: Electrical Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding Conference (Cat. No.01CH37264)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings: Electrical Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding Conference (Cat. No.01CH37264)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEIC.2001.965755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Several utilities both in Canada and in the USA have been using commercial on-line partial discharge (PD) systems as on-line monitoring tools. Partial discharge tests have been used historically to characterize bars/coils that have been sent to Powertech Laboratories for voltage endurance and thermal cycling tests so that the bars that displayed the highest PD quantities were subjected to voltage endurance tests. Utilities are now beginning to specify the limits for PD magnitudes and other related PD quantities as a quality assurance measure in their technical specifications for large motors and hydrogenerators. There appears to be confusion as to what are the reasonable limits for these quantities and whether or not these limits make practical sense. Since Powertech has had the unique opportunity to examine several insulation designs over the last decade this paper is an early attempt to document the current levels of PD quantities that are being measured on bars/coils being manufactured with modern insulation systems. No attempt has been made to correlate these quantities with its performance on voltage endurance (VE) test times but this work is ongoing. Several bars from different manufacturers were subjected to PD measurements at their normal line-to-ground voltage. These PD measurements were made using Powertech's classical PD system as well as a commercial system. One significant difference was that the PHA system uses pico-coulomb to represent charge magnitude while PDA system uses millivolt. Laboratory calibration was done to correlate these discharge magnitudes. Results showed that if the discharge magnitudes and the number of PD pulses were small both the classical and the commercial system gave similar PD responses. On the other hand if the discharge rate (number of pulses per second) was large the classical PD measurement system tended to saturate. Historically, when such saturation occurred during measurements with the classical PD system, measurements were repeated at a lower test voltage (for example 0.8 pu). Subsequent dissections of samples that exhibited such high PD showed the presence of a large number of voids in the groundwall insulation.
作为质量保证试验的形式缠绕线圈/棒用两种局部放电测量的比较测量
加拿大和美国的一些公用事业公司已经将商业在线局部放电(PD)系统作为在线监测工具。部分放电测试历来用于表征送至Powertech实验室进行耐压和热循环测试的棒/线圈,以便显示最高PD量的棒进行耐压测试。公用事业公司现在开始在其大型电机和水轮发电机的技术规范中规定PD震级和其他相关PD数量的限制,作为质量保证措施。对于这些量的合理限度是什么,以及这些限度是否具有实际意义,似乎存在混淆。由于Powertech在过去十年中有独特的机会研究了几种绝缘设计,因此本文是早期尝试记录使用现代绝缘系统制造的棒/线圈上测量的PD量的当前水平。没有尝试将这些数量与电压耐久性(VE)测试时间的性能联系起来,但这项工作正在进行中。来自不同制造商的几个棒在其正常的线对地电压下进行了PD测量。这些PD测量是使用Powertech的经典PD系统和商业系统进行的。一个显著的区别是PHA系统使用皮库仑来表示电荷大小,而PDA系统使用毫伏。进行了实验室校准以关联这些放电幅度。结果表明,当放电强度和放电脉冲数较小时,经典系统和商业系统的放电响应相似。另一方面,当放电速率(脉冲数/秒)较大时,经典PD测量系统趋于饱和。从历史上看,当在使用经典PD系统进行测量时发生这种饱和时,在较低的测试电压(例如0.8 pu)下重复测量。随后对具有如此高PD的样品的解剖表明,在地壁绝缘中存在大量空隙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信