Viabilidade do planeamento por etapas: visão dos estudantes-estagiários

João Andrade, A. Cruz, D. Patrício, Raquel Correia, Adilson Marques
{"title":"Viabilidade do planeamento por etapas: visão dos estudantes-estagiários","authors":"João Andrade, A. Cruz, D. Patrício, Raquel Correia, Adilson Marques","doi":"10.47863/cuwm8901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planning is a part of teaching-learning processes influencing its effectiveness. The accomplishment of this task is often difficult by the innumerable variants that the practical context of teaching presents. For this reason, it undergoes through several changes during its application. The model of physical education planning recommended in Portugal and defined by the PNEF (guiding document), is the step-by-step planning. This planning model structures the learning throughout the year, in logic of progression and monitoring the student’s development. There is no evidence to support this type of planning to be more effective compared to any other. As an indispensable tool for the teacher, it is important to find out if this type of planning is feasible, meeting the objectives that it proposes. Therefore, the purpose of this document was to investigate the perception of pre-service teachers about the viability of the step-by-step planning in the teaching process of physical education. As a method of data collection, a focus group was formed constituted by four pre-service teachers. The pre-service teachers concluded that this planning model is viable, admitting that its feasibility is dependent on certain factors.","PeriodicalId":286641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Pedagogy & Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Pedagogy & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47863/cuwm8901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planning is a part of teaching-learning processes influencing its effectiveness. The accomplishment of this task is often difficult by the innumerable variants that the practical context of teaching presents. For this reason, it undergoes through several changes during its application. The model of physical education planning recommended in Portugal and defined by the PNEF (guiding document), is the step-by-step planning. This planning model structures the learning throughout the year, in logic of progression and monitoring the student’s development. There is no evidence to support this type of planning to be more effective compared to any other. As an indispensable tool for the teacher, it is important to find out if this type of planning is feasible, meeting the objectives that it proposes. Therefore, the purpose of this document was to investigate the perception of pre-service teachers about the viability of the step-by-step planning in the teaching process of physical education. As a method of data collection, a focus group was formed constituted by four pre-service teachers. The pre-service teachers concluded that this planning model is viable, admitting that its feasibility is dependent on certain factors.
分阶段规划的可行性:学员的观点
计划是影响教学效果的教学过程的一部分。这一任务的完成往往是困难的,因为教学的实际环境呈现出无数的变化。因此,它在应用过程中经历了几次变化。葡萄牙的体育规划模式被PNEF(指导性文件)推荐并定义为分步规划。这种计划模式以进步的逻辑和监控学生的发展来组织全年的学习。没有证据表明这种计划比其他任何计划都更有效。作为教师不可或缺的工具,重要的是要找出这种规划是否可行,是否符合其提出的目标。因此,本研究的目的是调查职前教师对体育教学过程中分步计划可行性的看法。作为数据收集的方法,由4名职前教师组成焦点小组。职前教师认为该规划模式是可行的,承认其可行性取决于某些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信