Data structures for task-based priority scheduling

Martin Wimmer, F. Versaci, J. Träff, Daniel Cederman, P. Tsigas
{"title":"Data structures for task-based priority scheduling","authors":"Martin Wimmer, F. Versaci, J. Träff, Daniel Cederman, P. Tsigas","doi":"10.1145/2555243.2555278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present three lock-free data structures for priority task scheduling: a priority work-stealing one, a centralized one with ρ-relaxed semantics, and a hybrid one combining both concepts. With the single-source shortest path (SSSP) problem as example, we show how the different approaches affect the prioritization and provide upper bounds on the number of examined nodes. We argue that priority task scheduling allows for an intuitive and easy way to parallelize the SSSP problem, notoriously a hard task. Experimental evidence supports the good scalability of the resulting algorithm. The larger aim of this work is to understand the trade-offs between scalability and priority guarantees in task scheduling systems. We show that ρ-relaxation is a valuable technique for improving the first, while still allowing semantic constraints to be satisfied: the lock-free, hybrid $k$-priority data structure can scale as well as work-stealing, while still providing strong priority scheduling guarantees, which depend on the parameter k. Our theoretical results open up possibilities for even more scalable data structures by adopting a weaker form of ρ-relaxation, which still enables the semantic constraints to be respected.","PeriodicalId":286119,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2555243.2555278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

We present three lock-free data structures for priority task scheduling: a priority work-stealing one, a centralized one with ρ-relaxed semantics, and a hybrid one combining both concepts. With the single-source shortest path (SSSP) problem as example, we show how the different approaches affect the prioritization and provide upper bounds on the number of examined nodes. We argue that priority task scheduling allows for an intuitive and easy way to parallelize the SSSP problem, notoriously a hard task. Experimental evidence supports the good scalability of the resulting algorithm. The larger aim of this work is to understand the trade-offs between scalability and priority guarantees in task scheduling systems. We show that ρ-relaxation is a valuable technique for improving the first, while still allowing semantic constraints to be satisfied: the lock-free, hybrid $k$-priority data structure can scale as well as work-stealing, while still providing strong priority scheduling guarantees, which depend on the parameter k. Our theoretical results open up possibilities for even more scalable data structures by adopting a weaker form of ρ-relaxation, which still enables the semantic constraints to be respected.
基于任务优先级调度的数据结构
提出了三种用于优先级任务调度的无锁数据结构:优先级偷工数据结构、带ρ放松语义的集中式数据结构和混合数据结构。以单源最短路径(SSSP)问题为例,我们展示了不同的方法如何影响优先级,并提供了检查节点数量的上限。我们认为,优先级任务调度允许一种直观和简单的方法来并行化SSSP问题,这是一个众所周知的困难任务。实验证明该算法具有良好的可扩展性。这项工作的更大目标是理解任务调度系统中可伸缩性和优先级保证之间的权衡。我们证明了ρ松弛是一种有价值的技术,可以改进第一种方法,同时仍然允许满足语义约束:无锁,混合$k$优先级数据结构可以扩展和窃取工作,同时仍然提供依赖于参数k的强优先级调度保证。我们的理论结果通过采用较弱的ρ-松弛形式开辟了更可扩展的数据结构的可能性,这仍然使语义约束得到尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信