Exploring Human and Environmental Factors that Make Organizations Resilient to Social Engineering Attacks

Michelle Ancher, Erbilcan Aslan, Rick van der Kleij
{"title":"Exploring Human and Environmental Factors that Make Organizations Resilient to Social Engineering Attacks","authors":"Michelle Ancher, Erbilcan Aslan, Rick van der Kleij","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this explorative research social engineering attacks were studied, especially the ones that failed, in order to help organisations to become more resilient. Physical, phone and digital attacks were carried out using a script following the ‘social engineering cycle’. We used the COM-B model of behaviour change, refined by the Theoretical Domains Framework, to examine by means of a survey how Capability, Motivational and foremost Opportunity factors help to increase resilience of organisations against social engineering attacks. Within Opportunity, social influence seemed of extra importance. Employees who work in small sized enterprises (<50 employees) were more successful in withstanding digital social engineering attacks than employees who work in larger organisations. An explanation for this could be a greater amount of social control; these employees work in close proximity to one another, so they are able to check irregularities or warn each other. Also, having a conversation protocol installed on how to interact with outsiders, was a measure taken by all organisations where attacks by telephone failed. Therefore, it is more difficult for an outsider to get access to the organisation by means of social engineering. This paper ends with a discussion and some recommendations for organisations, e.g. the design of the work environment, to help increase their resilience against social engineering attacks.","PeriodicalId":373044,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors in Cybersecurity","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors in Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this explorative research social engineering attacks were studied, especially the ones that failed, in order to help organisations to become more resilient. Physical, phone and digital attacks were carried out using a script following the ‘social engineering cycle’. We used the COM-B model of behaviour change, refined by the Theoretical Domains Framework, to examine by means of a survey how Capability, Motivational and foremost Opportunity factors help to increase resilience of organisations against social engineering attacks. Within Opportunity, social influence seemed of extra importance. Employees who work in small sized enterprises (<50 employees) were more successful in withstanding digital social engineering attacks than employees who work in larger organisations. An explanation for this could be a greater amount of social control; these employees work in close proximity to one another, so they are able to check irregularities or warn each other. Also, having a conversation protocol installed on how to interact with outsiders, was a measure taken by all organisations where attacks by telephone failed. Therefore, it is more difficult for an outsider to get access to the organisation by means of social engineering. This paper ends with a discussion and some recommendations for organisations, e.g. the design of the work environment, to help increase their resilience against social engineering attacks.
探索使组织能够抵御社会工程攻击的人为和环境因素
在这项探索性研究中,研究了社会工程攻击,特别是那些失败的攻击,以帮助组织变得更有弹性。物理、电话和数字攻击都是按照“社会工程周期”的脚本进行的。我们使用COM-B行为改变模型,通过理论领域框架进行改进,通过一项调查来检查能力,动机和最重要的机会因素如何帮助提高组织抵御社会工程攻击的弹性。在机遇号内部,社会影响似乎格外重要。在小型企业(少于50名员工)工作的员工比在大型组织工作的员工更能成功地抵御数字社会工程攻击。对此的一种解释可能是更大程度的社会控制;这些员工彼此工作距离很近,因此他们能够检查违规行为或相互警告。此外,在电话攻击失败的情况下,所有组织都采取了一项措施,即安装有关如何与外界互动的对话协议。因此,外部人员通过社会工程的手段进入组织的难度更大。本文以讨论和对组织的一些建议结束,例如工作环境的设计,以帮助提高他们对社会工程攻击的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信