Efficiency, fairness and friendliness evaluation of TFRC and ARC rate-based congestion control

L. Grieco, S. Mascolo
{"title":"Efficiency, fairness and friendliness evaluation of TFRC and ARC rate-based congestion control","authors":"L. Grieco, S. Mascolo","doi":"10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has focused on two rate-based congestion control algorithms, namely TCP-friendly rate control (TFRC) and the adaptive rate control (ARC), for streaming flows over the Internet. After a brief description of the two algorithms, computer simulations using ns-2 have been reported to investigate intra-protocol fairness, inter-protocol friendliness and efficiency. The main results are given: (1) ARC is friendly towards Reno TCP whereas TFRC is not; (2) ARC increases fairness; (3) ARC remarkably improves the goodput with respect to TFRC and Reno TCP in the presence of wireless lossy links.","PeriodicalId":146713,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper has focused on two rate-based congestion control algorithms, namely TCP-friendly rate control (TFRC) and the adaptive rate control (ARC), for streaming flows over the Internet. After a brief description of the two algorithms, computer simulations using ns-2 have been reported to investigate intra-protocol fairness, inter-protocol friendliness and efficiency. The main results are given: (1) ARC is friendly towards Reno TCP whereas TFRC is not; (2) ARC increases fairness; (3) ARC remarkably improves the goodput with respect to TFRC and Reno TCP in the presence of wireless lossy links.
基于TFRC和ARC速率的拥塞控制的效率、公平和友好性评价
本文重点研究了两种基于速率的拥塞控制算法,即tcp友好速率控制(TFRC)和自适应速率控制(ARC),用于互联网上的流媒体流。在简要描述了这两种算法之后,使用ns-2进行计算机模拟,研究了协议内公平性、协议间友好性和效率。主要结果表明:(1)ARC对Reno TCP友好,而TFRC不友好;(2) ARC提高了公平性;(3)在存在无线有损链路的情况下,ARC显著提高了相对于TFRC和Reno TCP的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信