The Failure of Lifestyle Environmentalism and the Promise of the Green New Deal for Working-Class People

K. Bell, G. Bevan
{"title":"The Failure of Lifestyle Environmentalism and the Promise of the Green New Deal for Working-Class People","authors":"K. Bell, G. Bevan","doi":"10.13001/jwcs.v6i1.6465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an urgent need to address a range of environmental issues, including climate change, but the policies enacted to date have usually done nothing to address class inequities and have often led to increased working-class disadvantage. The causes of the climate and other environmental crises have often been located in problematic individual lifestyles, with little recognition of the time, economic and health constraints that make it difficult for working-class people to adopt green lifestyles. The Green New Deal (GND) presented an alternative policy paradigm that argued for environmental policies that, rather than increasing the pressure on disadvantaged groups, would have co-benefits for working-class people, low-income groups and communities of colour. However, the policy did not lead to electoral success for the political leaders that proposed it, in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), due to opposition representations of it as costly and threatening to working-class jobs. We interviewed 40 working-class people in the UK to find out how much they knew about the Green New Deal, what they thought about it as an environmental policy and how they felt about environmentalism, more generally. Our research indicates that there was a general lack of knowledge about GND, but great enthusiasm about it once explained, albeit with reservations about its implementation and limitations. The GND has huge potential to benefit the lives of working-class people but, we conclude, more, and better, outreach is needed for people to understand its potential to improve their lives.","PeriodicalId":258091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Working-Class Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/jwcs.v6i1.6465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is an urgent need to address a range of environmental issues, including climate change, but the policies enacted to date have usually done nothing to address class inequities and have often led to increased working-class disadvantage. The causes of the climate and other environmental crises have often been located in problematic individual lifestyles, with little recognition of the time, economic and health constraints that make it difficult for working-class people to adopt green lifestyles. The Green New Deal (GND) presented an alternative policy paradigm that argued for environmental policies that, rather than increasing the pressure on disadvantaged groups, would have co-benefits for working-class people, low-income groups and communities of colour. However, the policy did not lead to electoral success for the political leaders that proposed it, in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), due to opposition representations of it as costly and threatening to working-class jobs. We interviewed 40 working-class people in the UK to find out how much they knew about the Green New Deal, what they thought about it as an environmental policy and how they felt about environmentalism, more generally. Our research indicates that there was a general lack of knowledge about GND, but great enthusiasm about it once explained, albeit with reservations about its implementation and limitations. The GND has huge potential to benefit the lives of working-class people but, we conclude, more, and better, outreach is needed for people to understand its potential to improve their lives.
生活方式环保主义的失败和对工人阶级的绿色新政的承诺
我们迫切需要解决包括气候变化在内的一系列环境问题,但迄今为止制定的政策通常没有解决阶级不平等问题,而且往往导致工人阶级的劣势加剧。气候和其他环境危机的原因往往是个人生活方式有问题,很少认识到工人阶级难以采取绿色生活方式的时间、经济和健康限制。绿色新政(GND)提出了另一种政策范式,认为环境政策不会增加弱势群体的压力,而是会为工人阶级、低收入群体和有色人种社区带来共同利益。然而,在美国和英国,该政策并没有为提出该政策的政治领导人带来选举的成功,因为反对派认为该政策成本高昂,并威胁到工人阶级的工作。我们采访了英国的40名工人阶级,以了解他们对绿色新政的了解程度,他们认为这是一项环境政策,以及他们对环保主义的看法。我们的研究表明,人们普遍缺乏对GND的了解,但一旦解释了对它的极大热情,尽管对其实施和局限性有所保留。GND有巨大的潜力使工薪阶层的生活受益,但我们得出的结论是,需要更多、更好的推广,让人们了解它改善他们生活的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信