{"title":"Students’ digital competence: A scoping review of measuring instruments","authors":"Anika Miltuze, Sanita Litiņa","doi":"10.22364/htqe.2021.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s society, digital competence is becoming increasingly relevant, as this competence is necessary to function on both a personal and professional level. Digital competence is essential for students, since it enables them to exist in a digitalised world. Over the last few decades, the concept of digital competence has been used more frequently (Spante et al., 2018), and now it is actively discussed, particularly in terms of policy documents (European Council, 2018; European Commission, 2014; European Commission 2021). During the discussions related to policy, the following questions have been raised: 1) what kind of skills and knowledge people should possess in a knowledge society, and 2) what should be taught to young students and how it has to be done (Ilomäki et al., 2016). The purpose of the present scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant research regarding the instruments commonly used to measure digital competence of university students. Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) five-stage framework underpins the scoping review. Three databases were used to conduct a scoping literature review, including ERIC, ProQuest and EBSCO. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed publications written in English within the period from 2014 till 2020. Initially, 395 articles in total were selected; the full texts of 43 articles were assessed. Finally, only 13 out 395 articles that met the inclusion criteria were considered in the present research. This paper reports on three main categories: (1) definition of digital competence, (2) development and characteristics of an instrument measuring digital competence, and (3) key findings. The most commonly used framework found during this research was The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens 2.0. (Vuorikari et al., 2016). A larger part of studies reports on a designed self-assessment questionnaire comprising of multiple-choice items and quantitative evaluation of the competence. The scoping review showed that the majority of the existing tests enable to assess students’ digital information searching, communication and technical skills. The findings of previous studies indicate that students tend to overestimate their digital competence and lack knowledge of basic topics, the ones related to information and data literacy. Our findings point to the necessity to use different approaches for assessing digital competence on different levels.","PeriodicalId":173607,"journal":{"name":"Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In today’s society, digital competence is becoming increasingly relevant, as this competence is necessary to function on both a personal and professional level. Digital competence is essential for students, since it enables them to exist in a digitalised world. Over the last few decades, the concept of digital competence has been used more frequently (Spante et al., 2018), and now it is actively discussed, particularly in terms of policy documents (European Council, 2018; European Commission, 2014; European Commission 2021). During the discussions related to policy, the following questions have been raised: 1) what kind of skills and knowledge people should possess in a knowledge society, and 2) what should be taught to young students and how it has to be done (Ilomäki et al., 2016). The purpose of the present scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant research regarding the instruments commonly used to measure digital competence of university students. Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) five-stage framework underpins the scoping review. Three databases were used to conduct a scoping literature review, including ERIC, ProQuest and EBSCO. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed publications written in English within the period from 2014 till 2020. Initially, 395 articles in total were selected; the full texts of 43 articles were assessed. Finally, only 13 out 395 articles that met the inclusion criteria were considered in the present research. This paper reports on three main categories: (1) definition of digital competence, (2) development and characteristics of an instrument measuring digital competence, and (3) key findings. The most commonly used framework found during this research was The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens 2.0. (Vuorikari et al., 2016). A larger part of studies reports on a designed self-assessment questionnaire comprising of multiple-choice items and quantitative evaluation of the competence. The scoping review showed that the majority of the existing tests enable to assess students’ digital information searching, communication and technical skills. The findings of previous studies indicate that students tend to overestimate their digital competence and lack knowledge of basic topics, the ones related to information and data literacy. Our findings point to the necessity to use different approaches for assessing digital competence on different levels.
在当今社会,数字能力变得越来越重要,因为这种能力在个人和专业层面上都是必要的。数字能力对学生来说至关重要,因为它使他们能够在数字化世界中生存。在过去的几十年里,数字能力的概念得到了更频繁的使用(Spante等人,2018),现在它被积极讨论,特别是在政策文件方面(欧洲理事会,2018;欧盟委员会,2014;欧盟委员会2021)。在与政策相关的讨论中,提出了以下问题:1)在知识社会中人们应该拥有什么样的技能和知识,2)应该向年轻学生传授什么以及如何做到这一点(Ilomäki et al., 2016)。本研究的目的是对大学生数字能力测量常用工具的相关研究进行全面概述。Arksey和O 'Malley(2005)的五阶段框架支撑了范围审查。使用ERIC、ProQuest和EBSCO三个数据库进行文献综述。纳入标准是2014年至2020年期间用英文撰写的同行评议出版物。最初,共有395篇文章入选;评估了43篇文章的全文。最后,在395篇符合纳入标准的文章中,本研究只考虑了13篇。本文报告了三个主要类别:(1)数字能力的定义,(2)数字能力测量工具的发展和特征,以及(3)主要发现。在这项研究中发现最常用的框架是欧洲公民数字能力框架2.0。(Vuorikari et al., 2016)。大部分研究报告设计了一份自我评估问卷,包括多项选择题和能力的定量评估。范围审查表明,现有的大多数考试能够评估学生的数字信息搜索、沟通和技术技能。以往的研究结果表明,学生倾向于高估自己的数字能力,缺乏与信息和数据素养相关的基本主题知识。我们的研究结果指出,有必要在不同层次上使用不同的方法来评估数字能力。