The Public Trust Doctrine and the Climate Crisis: Panacea or Platitude?

Joseph Regalia
{"title":"The Public Trust Doctrine and the Climate Crisis: Panacea or Platitude?","authors":"Joseph Regalia","doi":"10.36640/mjeal.11.1.public","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over a year of shutting down the global economy during the COVID pandemic achieved about .01 degrees of improvement in global warming. Not even a drop in the bucket. We continue to face a monumental climate crisis. And of the many ways that crisis threatens our environment, winnowing water resources is one of the scariest. One solution that many scholars have turned to is the public trust doctrine. At first blush, this doctrine sounds like a panacea for water management problems: When our water resources are threatened enough that current and future citizen’s access to it is in peril, the trust kicks in. The government must take steps to protect our waterbodies. So no surprise that scholars have flocked to the doctrine and analyzed just about every angle of the public trust. Save perhaps one: Does it even work? Much less attention has been paid to what concrete impact the public trust is having on real litigation. There is no shortage of language in case law or state statutes about the trust. But does that language do any good? This article tries to answer that question, collecting data about state court decisions mentioning the public trust doctrine in thirty states. Our team reviewed the cases and coded them based on how authorities used the public trust doctrine. Our goal was to answer a key question: When does the public trust doctrine matter in real cases? In other words, when do courts use the doctrine to protect natural water resources? Beyond shedding light on how effective the doctrine is on the ground, this article’s goal is to offer insights about both successful and unsuccessful cases. What can we learn from the cases in which it does work that might equip litigants to wield this weapon better in the future? In most cases reviewed, the public trust doctrine was ineffective at combatting climate change or other harms to natural water resources. But the data offers ideas for moving forward towards a version of the public trust that will have teeth in the climate fight.","PeriodicalId":302203,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.11.1.public","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over a year of shutting down the global economy during the COVID pandemic achieved about .01 degrees of improvement in global warming. Not even a drop in the bucket. We continue to face a monumental climate crisis. And of the many ways that crisis threatens our environment, winnowing water resources is one of the scariest. One solution that many scholars have turned to is the public trust doctrine. At first blush, this doctrine sounds like a panacea for water management problems: When our water resources are threatened enough that current and future citizen’s access to it is in peril, the trust kicks in. The government must take steps to protect our waterbodies. So no surprise that scholars have flocked to the doctrine and analyzed just about every angle of the public trust. Save perhaps one: Does it even work? Much less attention has been paid to what concrete impact the public trust is having on real litigation. There is no shortage of language in case law or state statutes about the trust. But does that language do any good? This article tries to answer that question, collecting data about state court decisions mentioning the public trust doctrine in thirty states. Our team reviewed the cases and coded them based on how authorities used the public trust doctrine. Our goal was to answer a key question: When does the public trust doctrine matter in real cases? In other words, when do courts use the doctrine to protect natural water resources? Beyond shedding light on how effective the doctrine is on the ground, this article’s goal is to offer insights about both successful and unsuccessful cases. What can we learn from the cases in which it does work that might equip litigants to wield this weapon better in the future? In most cases reviewed, the public trust doctrine was ineffective at combatting climate change or other harms to natural water resources. But the data offers ideas for moving forward towards a version of the public trust that will have teeth in the climate fight.
公共信托原则与气候危机:万灵药还是陈词滥调?
在新冠疫情期间,全球经济停摆了一年多,全球变暖状况改善了约0.01度。甚至是九牛一毛。我们继续面临巨大的气候危机。在危机威胁我们环境的许多方式中,水资源的流失是最可怕的一种。许多学者转向的一个解决方案是公共信托原则。乍一看,这一原则听起来像是解决水资源管理问题的灵丹妙药:当我们的水资源受到足够的威胁,以至于当前和未来的公民对水资源的使用处于危险之中时,信托就会发挥作用。政府必须采取措施保护我们的水体。因此,毫不奇怪,学者们纷纷研究这一理论,并从各个角度分析公众信任。也许还有一个问题:它真的有用吗?公众信托对实际诉讼的具体影响受到的关注要少得多。在判例法或州法规中,关于信托的语言并不缺乏。但这种语言有什么好处吗?本文试图回答这个问题,收集了30个州的州法院判决中提到公共信托原则的数据。我们的团队审查了这些案例,并根据当局如何使用公共信托原则对它们进行了编码。我们的目标是回答一个关键问题:公共信托原则在实际案件中何时起作用?换句话说,法院何时使用该原则来保护自然水资源?除了阐明这一原则在实践中的有效性之外,本文的目标是提供有关成功案例和不成功案例的见解。我们能从它起作用的案例中学到什么,让诉讼当事人在未来更好地运用这一武器?在审查的大多数案例中,公共信托原则在应对气候变化或对自然水资源的其他危害方面是无效的。但这些数据提供了一些想法,可以让我们朝着一种公众信任的方向前进,这种信任将在应对气候变化的斗争中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信