Teachers’ Views on Force and Motion: Towards the Development of Two-tier Test

Daniel A. Dapitan, D. Caballes
{"title":"Teachers’ Views on Force and Motion: Towards the Development of Two-tier Test","authors":"Daniel A. Dapitan, D. Caballes","doi":"10.36039/AA022020005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to develop a two-tier multiple-choice quality assessment tool based from the views of teachers. The study employed descriptive design with qualitative analysis. The researchers interviewed and employed the test to science teachers who specialize physics, biology and chemistry. The researchers utilized 15 multiple-choice tests about motion have been validated by experts. The result shows alternative conceptions on force and motion are the definition of nonzero value and how to interpret graphs of motion, whether it is distance, velocity or acceleration time graph.  The study suggests that getting views, whether teachers or students prior to testing, is a big help in doing a quality assessment tool.  Ping this test, firstly, content boundaries, learning objectives and alternative conceptions were identified.","PeriodicalId":360729,"journal":{"name":"Automation and Autonomous System","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automation and Autonomous System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36039/AA022020005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a two-tier multiple-choice quality assessment tool based from the views of teachers. The study employed descriptive design with qualitative analysis. The researchers interviewed and employed the test to science teachers who specialize physics, biology and chemistry. The researchers utilized 15 multiple-choice tests about motion have been validated by experts. The result shows alternative conceptions on force and motion are the definition of nonzero value and how to interpret graphs of motion, whether it is distance, velocity or acceleration time graph.  The study suggests that getting views, whether teachers or students prior to testing, is a big help in doing a quality assessment tool.  Ping this test, firstly, content boundaries, learning objectives and alternative conceptions were identified.
教师对力与运动的看法:迈向二级测验的发展
本研究的目的是开发一个基于教师观点的双层选择题质量评估工具。本研究采用描述性设计与定性分析相结合的方法。研究人员采访了物理、生物和化学专业的科学教师,并对他们进行了测试。研究人员利用了15个关于运动的多项选择题,并得到了专家的验证。结果表明,力和运动的不同概念是非零值的定义以及如何解释运动图形,无论是距离、速度还是加速度时间图。该研究表明,在测试前获得意见,无论是教师还是学生,都对制作质量评估工具有很大帮助。在本次测试中,首先确定了内容边界、学习目标和替代概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信