Internet use for online learning among youth: Differences across European countries and educational levels

M. P. Bach, I. Miloloza, J. Zoroja
{"title":"Internet use for online learning among youth: Differences across European countries and educational levels","authors":"M. P. Bach, I. Miloloza, J. Zoroja","doi":"10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abundant availability of online courses and materials has greatly expanded the opportunities for gaining new knowledge and skills, especially among younger population. Most of these courses and materials are freeware or could be purchased for a cost substantially lower than compared to those offered by HEIs or publishing companies. Although these new opportunities are available to everyone, researches indicate that their usage is not evenly spread across European countries and educational levels. Goal of the research is to investigate if the usage of online learning materials and courses over Internet is homogenous in Europe among youth (age 16–29) of low, medium, and high level education. Research has been conducted on the data from Eurostat Database on the following aspects of Internet use (i) Looking for information about education, training or course offers; (ii) Doing an online course (of any subject); (iii) Usage of online learning material; (iv) Communicating with instructors or students using educational websites/portals; (v) Usage of any aspect of online learning. Cluster analysis has been conducted in order to create a group of countries according to different level of internet usage for online learning. Relationship of GDP per capita has been compared across identified clusters.","PeriodicalId":431110,"journal":{"name":"2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abundant availability of online courses and materials has greatly expanded the opportunities for gaining new knowledge and skills, especially among younger population. Most of these courses and materials are freeware or could be purchased for a cost substantially lower than compared to those offered by HEIs or publishing companies. Although these new opportunities are available to everyone, researches indicate that their usage is not evenly spread across European countries and educational levels. Goal of the research is to investigate if the usage of online learning materials and courses over Internet is homogenous in Europe among youth (age 16–29) of low, medium, and high level education. Research has been conducted on the data from Eurostat Database on the following aspects of Internet use (i) Looking for information about education, training or course offers; (ii) Doing an online course (of any subject); (iii) Usage of online learning material; (iv) Communicating with instructors or students using educational websites/portals; (v) Usage of any aspect of online learning. Cluster analysis has been conducted in order to create a group of countries according to different level of internet usage for online learning. Relationship of GDP per capita has been compared across identified clusters.
青少年在线学习的互联网使用:欧洲国家和教育水平的差异
在线课程和材料的大量可用性大大扩大了获得新知识和技能的机会,特别是在年轻人中。这些课程和材料大多是免费软件,或者可以以比高等教育机构或出版公司提供的费用低得多的价格购买。尽管每个人都可以获得这些新的机会,但研究表明,它们的使用在欧洲国家和教育水平上并不均匀地分布。本研究的目的是调查欧洲低、中、高等教育水平的青少年(16-29岁)在互联网上使用在线学习材料和课程的情况是否相同。对欧共体统计局数据库关于互联网使用的下列方面的数据进行了研究:(i)寻找关于教育、培训或课程提供的资料;(ii)参加在线课程(任何科目);在线学习材料的使用;(iv)使用教育网站/门户网站与教师或学生沟通;(v)使用在线学习的任何方面。进行聚类分析是为了根据不同的互联网使用水平创建一组国家进行在线学习。在确定的集群中比较了人均GDP的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信