The Role of Treatment Perceptions in Intervention Evaluation: A Review

S. Sidani, Mary T. Fox
{"title":"The Role of Treatment Perceptions in Intervention Evaluation: A Review","authors":"S. Sidani, Mary T. Fox","doi":"10.31770/2561-7516.1079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : With the emphasis on patient-centeredness, the interest in examining people’s perceptions of health interventions has resurged. Mounting evidence suggests that people’s perceptions play an important role in their pursuit and use of interventions in the practice and research contexts. In research, participants’ perceptions of the treatments under evaluation affect their behaviors reflected in enrollment, attrition, and treatment implementation (i.e., engagement and enactment by participants), all of which contribute to outcomes. Objectives : The objectives of this review are to generate a common understanding of treatment perceptions and to increase awareness of their role in intervention evaluation trials. Method : A literature review was conducted of conceptual and empirical articles that examined the contribution of participants’ perceptions of treatment to enrollment, attrition, as well as treatment implementation and outcome achievement in intervention evaluation studies. Results : In this paper, we clarify the conceptualization and operationalization of four types of perceptions: acceptability, preferences, credibility and expectancy. We also describe the way in which these perceptions influence participants’ behaviors (i.e., mechanism of action), and we summarize relevant empirical evidence. Implications and conclusion : Researchers are encouraged to account for participants’ perceptions in making inferences about interventions’ effectiveness or lack thereof.","PeriodicalId":184801,"journal":{"name":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices - Science infirmière et pratiques en santé","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices - Science infirmière et pratiques en santé","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31770/2561-7516.1079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction : With the emphasis on patient-centeredness, the interest in examining people’s perceptions of health interventions has resurged. Mounting evidence suggests that people’s perceptions play an important role in their pursuit and use of interventions in the practice and research contexts. In research, participants’ perceptions of the treatments under evaluation affect their behaviors reflected in enrollment, attrition, and treatment implementation (i.e., engagement and enactment by participants), all of which contribute to outcomes. Objectives : The objectives of this review are to generate a common understanding of treatment perceptions and to increase awareness of their role in intervention evaluation trials. Method : A literature review was conducted of conceptual and empirical articles that examined the contribution of participants’ perceptions of treatment to enrollment, attrition, as well as treatment implementation and outcome achievement in intervention evaluation studies. Results : In this paper, we clarify the conceptualization and operationalization of four types of perceptions: acceptability, preferences, credibility and expectancy. We also describe the way in which these perceptions influence participants’ behaviors (i.e., mechanism of action), and we summarize relevant empirical evidence. Implications and conclusion : Researchers are encouraged to account for participants’ perceptions in making inferences about interventions’ effectiveness or lack thereof.
治疗知觉在干预评估中的作用:综述
导言:随着对以患者为中心的强调,对检查人们对卫生干预措施的看法的兴趣已经恢复。越来越多的证据表明,在实践和研究背景下,人们的观念在追求和使用干预措施方面发挥着重要作用。在研究中,参与者对评估治疗的感知影响他们的行为,这些行为反映在入组、减员和治疗实施(即参与者的参与和制定)中,所有这些都有助于结果。目的:本综述的目的是产生对治疗观念的共同理解,并提高对其在干预评估试验中的作用的认识。方法:对概念和实证文章进行文献回顾,研究干预评估研究中参与者对治疗的看法对入组、减员、治疗实施和结果实现的贡献。结果:在本文中,我们澄清了四种感知的概念化和操作化:可接受性、偏好、可信度和期望。我们还描述了这些感知影响参与者行为的方式(即行动机制),并总结了相关的经验证据。含义和结论:鼓励研究人员在推断干预措施的有效性或缺乏有效性时考虑参与者的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信