Inkompatibilitas Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Penyederhanaan Regulasi

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art8

Idul Rishan, I. Nika

{"title":"Inkompatibilitas Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Penyederhanaan Regulasi","authors":"Idul Rishan, I. Nika","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations. This study aims to analyze two things. First, the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations in Indonesia. Second, formulating the reasons from which the omnibus method is not compatible in the simplification of regulations. The method used is a doctrinal legal research based on secondary data. The results of the study conclude that: (1) there are 11 regulatory clusters in the Job Creation Law with 81 affected laws and 2 repealed laws. By the time this study was completed, the omnibus law method had produced 47 Government Regulations and 4 Presidential Regulations. (2) there is no correlation between the usefulness of the omnibus law method and the efforts to simplify regulations. There are three reasons behind it, which includes: (a) the absence of regulatory normality threshold indicators (b) the omnibus method is more compatible to be used as a technique for simplifying regulations and (c) the omnibus law method creates the need for complex regulatory synchronization and has the potential to increase the volume of regulation.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study focuses on the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations. This study aims to analyze two things. First, the application of the omnibus law method in the simplification of regulations in Indonesia. Second, formulating the reasons from which the omnibus method is not compatible in the simplification of regulations. The method used is a doctrinal legal research based on secondary data. The results of the study conclude that: (1) there are 11 regulatory clusters in the Job Creation Law with 81 affected laws and 2 repealed laws. By the time this study was completed, the omnibus law method had produced 47 Government Regulations and 4 Presidential Regulations. (2) there is no correlation between the usefulness of the omnibus law method and the efforts to simplify regulations. There are three reasons behind it, which includes: (a) the absence of regulatory normality threshold indicators (b) the omnibus method is more compatible to be used as a technique for simplifying regulations and (c) the omnibus law method creates the need for complex regulatory synchronization and has the potential to increase the volume of regulation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

兼容性法法方法在简化规则

本文的研究重点是综合法方法在法规简化中的应用。本研究旨在分析两件事。第一，综合法方法在印尼法规简化中的应用。其次，阐述了综合法在法规简化中不兼容的原因。所使用的方法是基于二手数据的理论法律研究。研究结果表明:(1)《创造就业法》有11个监管集群，其中81个受到影响，2个被废除。到本研究完成时，综合法已经产生了47个政府条例和4个总统条例。(2)综合法方法的有用性与简化法规的努力之间没有相关性。其背后有三个原因，其中包括:(a)缺乏监管常态性阈值指标(b)综合法更适合用作简化法规的技术，以及(c)综合法方法需要复杂的监管同步，并有可能增加监管量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum

自引率

0.00%

发文量