C

David Anthony
{"title":"C","authors":"David Anthony","doi":"10.1515/9783110632903-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a new method for determining the Galactic gravitational potential based on forward modeling of tidal stellar streams. We use this method to test the performance of smooth and static analytic potentials in representing realistic dark matter halos, which have substructure and are continually evolving by accretion. Our FAST-FORWARD method uses a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to compare, in six-dimensional phase space, an “observed” stream to models created in trial analytic potentials. We analyze a large sample of streams that evolved in the Via Lactea II (VL2) simulation, which represents a realistic Galactic halo potential. The recovered potential parameters are in agreement with the best fit to the global, present-day VL2 potential. However, merely assuming an analytic potential limits the dark matter halo mass measurement to an accuracy of 5%–20%, depending on the choice of analytic parameterization. Collectively, the mass estimates using streams from our sample reach this fundamental limit, but individually they can be highly biased. Individual streams can both underand overestimate the mass, and the bias is progressively worse for those with smaller perigalacticons, motivating the search for tidal streams at galactocentric distances larger than 70 kpc. We estimate that the assumption of a static and smooth dark matter potential in modeling of the GD-1and Pal5-like streams introduces an error of up to 50% in the Milky Way mass estimates.","PeriodicalId":361842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 19","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110632903-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a new method for determining the Galactic gravitational potential based on forward modeling of tidal stellar streams. We use this method to test the performance of smooth and static analytic potentials in representing realistic dark matter halos, which have substructure and are continually evolving by accretion. Our FAST-FORWARD method uses a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to compare, in six-dimensional phase space, an “observed” stream to models created in trial analytic potentials. We analyze a large sample of streams that evolved in the Via Lactea II (VL2) simulation, which represents a realistic Galactic halo potential. The recovered potential parameters are in agreement with the best fit to the global, present-day VL2 potential. However, merely assuming an analytic potential limits the dark matter halo mass measurement to an accuracy of 5%–20%, depending on the choice of analytic parameterization. Collectively, the mass estimates using streams from our sample reach this fundamental limit, but individually they can be highly biased. Individual streams can both underand overestimate the mass, and the bias is progressively worse for those with smaller perigalacticons, motivating the search for tidal streams at galactocentric distances larger than 70 kpc. We estimate that the assumption of a static and smooth dark matter potential in modeling of the GD-1and Pal5-like streams introduces an error of up to 50% in the Milky Way mass estimates.
C
我们提出了一种基于潮汐恒星流正演模拟的确定银河系引力势的新方法。我们用这种方法测试了光滑分析势和静态分析势在表示具有子结构并通过吸积不断演化的现实暗物质晕中的性能。我们的FAST-FORWARD方法使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗算法来比较,在六维相空间中,一个“观察到的”流与在试验分析电位中创建的模型。我们分析了在Via Lactea II (VL2)模拟中进化的大量流样本,它代表了现实的银河系晕潜力。恢复的电位参数与当前全球VL2电位的最佳拟合一致。然而,仅仅假设一个分析势限制了暗物质晕质量测量的精度在5%-20%,这取决于分析参数化的选择。总的来说,使用样本流的质量估计达到了这个基本极限,但单独来看,它们可能有很大的偏差。个别的潮汐流可能会低估或高估质量,而对于那些具有较小的半星系活动的潮汐流来说,这种偏差会越来越严重,这促使人们在星系中心距离大于70kpc的地方寻找潮汐流。我们估计,假设在模拟gd -1和pal5类流时存在静态和平滑的暗物质势,在银河系质量估计中引入了高达50%的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信