Immiserizing Growth: An Overview

Paul Shaffer
{"title":"Immiserizing Growth: An Overview","authors":"Paul Shaffer","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198832317.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a survey of theoretical and empirical issues related to immiserizing growth (IG). It reviews historical antecedents, including the towering figures of classical political economy—Malthus, Ricardo, and Marx—who held different versions of the IG idea. A number of the causal mechanisms generating IG outcomes are then reviewed, drawing on diverse traditions of scholarship, with a focus on political economy, politics, and the policy process. Finally, the empirical literature is examined drawing on cross-country and country case information. The chapter concludes that IG is not an insignificant empirical phenomenon, which has been somewhat overlooked in light of the prevailing narrative that ‘growth is good for the poor’.","PeriodicalId":322043,"journal":{"name":"Immiserizing Growth","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immiserizing Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198832317.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This chapter provides a survey of theoretical and empirical issues related to immiserizing growth (IG). It reviews historical antecedents, including the towering figures of classical political economy—Malthus, Ricardo, and Marx—who held different versions of the IG idea. A number of the causal mechanisms generating IG outcomes are then reviewed, drawing on diverse traditions of scholarship, with a focus on political economy, politics, and the policy process. Finally, the empirical literature is examined drawing on cross-country and country case information. The chapter concludes that IG is not an insignificant empirical phenomenon, which has been somewhat overlooked in light of the prevailing narrative that ‘growth is good for the poor’.
贫困增长:概述
本章提供了一个关于贫困增长(IG)的理论和实证问题的调查。它回顾了历史上的先例,包括古典政治经济学的杰出人物——马尔萨斯、李嘉图和马克思——他们持有不同版本的IG思想。然后,根据不同的学术传统,对产生IG结果的一些因果机制进行了回顾,重点是政治经济学、政治学和政策过程。最后,根据跨国和国家案例信息对实证文献进行了检验。本章的结论是,IG不是一个微不足道的经验现象,它在某种程度上被“增长对穷人有利”的主流叙事所忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信