Joint optimization of 2-tier dual-homing for NodeBs and RNCs in UMTS networks using meta-heuristic techniques

S. Sadhukhan, S. Mandal, S. Shaw, Debashis Saha
{"title":"Joint optimization of 2-tier dual-homing for NodeBs and RNCs in UMTS networks using meta-heuristic techniques","authors":"S. Sadhukhan, S. Mandal, S. Shaw, Debashis Saha","doi":"10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional design of UMTS networks usually involves single-homing (i.e., many-to-one mapping) of NodeBs to Radio Network Controllers (RNCs) in tier-1 (i.e., a group of NodeBs is connected to a single RNC) and that of RNCs to Mobile Switching Centres (MSCs) as well as to Serving GPRS Support Nodes (SGSNs) in tier-2 (i.e., a group of RNCs is connected to a single MSC/SGSN). Thus, any NodeB is connected to only one RNC and any RNC is connected to only one MSC/SGSN. However, as subscriber distribution changes over time and new mobility patterns of subscribers begin to evolve, single homing solution sometimes becomes inefficient in terms of handoff cost minimization. One solution to this brown-field operational problem is dual-homing extension of some selected NodeBs and RNCs (i.e., some NodeBs are connected to two RNCs in tier-1 and some RNCs to two MSCs/SGSNs in tier-2) in order to reduce the handoff cost. Traditionally, this optimization problem has been formulated separately for each tier and solved independently, thereby missing the global optimal solution. In this paper, we have first shown how to combine the optimization problems across the two tiers and then mapped the joint dual homing optimization problem into a classical search problem. Next, we have used two common meta-heuristic techniques, namely Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search, to solve the above problem. Comparison of the results obtained from joint dual homing with the published results for individual dual homing reveals that the joint dual homing performs considerably better than individual dual homing that attacks NodeB level and RNC level separately and independently.","PeriodicalId":302678,"journal":{"name":"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2011.5716508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Conventional design of UMTS networks usually involves single-homing (i.e., many-to-one mapping) of NodeBs to Radio Network Controllers (RNCs) in tier-1 (i.e., a group of NodeBs is connected to a single RNC) and that of RNCs to Mobile Switching Centres (MSCs) as well as to Serving GPRS Support Nodes (SGSNs) in tier-2 (i.e., a group of RNCs is connected to a single MSC/SGSN). Thus, any NodeB is connected to only one RNC and any RNC is connected to only one MSC/SGSN. However, as subscriber distribution changes over time and new mobility patterns of subscribers begin to evolve, single homing solution sometimes becomes inefficient in terms of handoff cost minimization. One solution to this brown-field operational problem is dual-homing extension of some selected NodeBs and RNCs (i.e., some NodeBs are connected to two RNCs in tier-1 and some RNCs to two MSCs/SGSNs in tier-2) in order to reduce the handoff cost. Traditionally, this optimization problem has been formulated separately for each tier and solved independently, thereby missing the global optimal solution. In this paper, we have first shown how to combine the optimization problems across the two tiers and then mapped the joint dual homing optimization problem into a classical search problem. Next, we have used two common meta-heuristic techniques, namely Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search, to solve the above problem. Comparison of the results obtained from joint dual homing with the published results for individual dual homing reveals that the joint dual homing performs considerably better than individual dual homing that attacks NodeB level and RNC level separately and independently.
基于元启发式技术的UMTS网络中节点和rnc两层双归巢联合优化
UMTS网络的传统设计通常涉及一级的节点到无线网络控制器(RNC)的单归属(即,多对一映射)(即,一组节点连接到单个RNC),以及二级的RNC到移动交换中心(MSCs)以及服务GPRS支持节点(SGSNs)(即,一组RNC连接到单个MSC/SGSN)。因此,任何NodeB只能连接到一个RNC,任何RNC只能连接到一个MSC/SGSN。然而,随着用户分布随着时间的推移而变化,并且用户的新移动模式开始发展,单个主巢解决方案有时在切换成本最小化方面变得低效。棕域操作问题的一个解决方案是将一些选定的nodeb和rnc进行双归巢扩展(即,一些nodeb连接到第1层的两个rnc,一些rnc连接到第2层的两个MSCs/ sgsn),以减少切换成本。传统的优化问题是对每一层单独制定,独立求解,从而失去了全局最优解。在本文中,我们首先展示了如何将两层的优化问题结合起来,然后将联合对偶寻的优化问题映射为一个经典的搜索问题。接下来,我们使用了两种常见的元启发式技术,即模拟退火和禁忌搜索来解决上述问题。将联合双寻的结果与已发表的单个双寻的结果进行比较,发现联合双寻的性能明显优于单独和独立攻击NodeB级和RNC级的单个双寻的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信