Accounting History Research in Italy, 1990–2004: An Introduction

Lino Cinquini, A. Marelli
{"title":"Accounting History Research in Italy, 1990–2004: An Introduction","authors":"Lino Cinquini, A. Marelli","doi":"10.1080/09585200601127509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent publication of monographic issues of international journals such as Accounting, Business & Financial History devoted to the development of accounting in different countries bears testimony to the recognition of the importance of, and the increasing interest in, the nature of differences and similarities in accounting throughout the world. This special issue on accounting history in Italy follows on those devoted to France (Parker et al., 1997; Boyns & Nikitin, 2001), the United States of America (Tyson & Fleischman, 2000), Japan (Chiba & Cooke, 2001), Spain (Boyns & Carmona, 2002), China (Lu & Aitken, 2003) and Germany (Evans, 2005). Up till now, the Italian scenario has not been so extensively studied in the international context, unlike those of other countries, with the exception of the international tribute accorded to the Italian founder of double-entry bookkeeping, Fra’ Luca Pacioli (1494). Although accounting history has a notable tradition in Italy (Onida, 1947; Melis, 1950; Giannessi, 1954; Amaduzzi, 2004), only a few contributions can be found in international publications depicting the evolution of accounting and business studies in Italy (Galassi, 1984; Canziani, 1994; Zan, 1994). According to Zan (1994), Italian historiography has traditionally given prominence to the identification of the relevant steps in the development, by Gino Zappa, of ‘Economia Aziendale’ (business economics) – in accordance with the view of a linear progression in Italian accounting history towards this end point. In this way, Italian historiography has enclosed itself in a substantial ‘parochialism’ concerned with the evolutionary picture of the history of Italian business doctrines, a research which has been conducted in a manner which has meant that it has been substantially removed from the international context. Indeed, the bulk of the Italian studies on accounting history, whether in domestic or international publications, have been focused on Gino Zappa’s theory, developed in the 1920s. In particular, papers have examined the extent of the scientific importance of this theory, and by an assessment of Zappa’s key contribution to the development of Italian accounting and business thought (Ferraris Franceschi, 1994; Canziani, 1994; Mattessich & Galassi, 2004).","PeriodicalId":399197,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Business & Financial History","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Business & Financial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585200601127509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The recent publication of monographic issues of international journals such as Accounting, Business & Financial History devoted to the development of accounting in different countries bears testimony to the recognition of the importance of, and the increasing interest in, the nature of differences and similarities in accounting throughout the world. This special issue on accounting history in Italy follows on those devoted to France (Parker et al., 1997; Boyns & Nikitin, 2001), the United States of America (Tyson & Fleischman, 2000), Japan (Chiba & Cooke, 2001), Spain (Boyns & Carmona, 2002), China (Lu & Aitken, 2003) and Germany (Evans, 2005). Up till now, the Italian scenario has not been so extensively studied in the international context, unlike those of other countries, with the exception of the international tribute accorded to the Italian founder of double-entry bookkeeping, Fra’ Luca Pacioli (1494). Although accounting history has a notable tradition in Italy (Onida, 1947; Melis, 1950; Giannessi, 1954; Amaduzzi, 2004), only a few contributions can be found in international publications depicting the evolution of accounting and business studies in Italy (Galassi, 1984; Canziani, 1994; Zan, 1994). According to Zan (1994), Italian historiography has traditionally given prominence to the identification of the relevant steps in the development, by Gino Zappa, of ‘Economia Aziendale’ (business economics) – in accordance with the view of a linear progression in Italian accounting history towards this end point. In this way, Italian historiography has enclosed itself in a substantial ‘parochialism’ concerned with the evolutionary picture of the history of Italian business doctrines, a research which has been conducted in a manner which has meant that it has been substantially removed from the international context. Indeed, the bulk of the Italian studies on accounting history, whether in domestic or international publications, have been focused on Gino Zappa’s theory, developed in the 1920s. In particular, papers have examined the extent of the scientific importance of this theory, and by an assessment of Zappa’s key contribution to the development of Italian accounting and business thought (Ferraris Franceschi, 1994; Canziani, 1994; Mattessich & Galassi, 2004).
意大利会计史研究,1990-2004:导论
最近出版的国际期刊,如《会计》、《商业与金融史》,专门讨论不同国家会计的发展,证明了人们认识到世界各地会计差异和相似之处的重要性,并对其性质越来越感兴趣。这个关于意大利会计史的特别问题是继那些致力于法国的问题(Parker等人,1997;Boyns & Nikitin, 2001)、美国(Tyson & Fleischman, 2000)、日本(Chiba & Cooke, 2001)、西班牙(Boyns & Carmona, 2002)、中国(Lu & Aitken, 2003)和德国(Evans, 2005)。到目前为止,意大利的情况还没有在国际范围内得到如此广泛的研究,不像其他国家,除了国际上对复式记账法的意大利创始人Fra ' Luca Pacioli(1494)的致敬。虽然会计历史在意大利有显著的传统(Onida, 1947;梅丽莎,1950;Giannessi, 1954;Amaduzzi, 2004),只有少数贡献可以在国际出版物中找到描述意大利会计和商业研究的演变(Galassi, 1984;Canziani, 1994;攒,1994)。根据Zan(1994)的观点,意大利史学传统上突出了吉诺·扎帕(Gino Zappa)对“Economia Aziendale”(商业经济学)发展的相关步骤的识别——按照意大利会计历史向这一终点的线性发展的观点。通过这种方式,意大利史学将自己封闭在一种实质性的“狭隘主义”中,关注意大利商业理论历史的演变图景,这种研究的进行方式意味着它已经基本上脱离了国际背景。事实上,意大利对会计史的大部分研究,无论是在国内还是在国际出版物中,都集中在吉诺·扎帕(Gino Zappa)在20世纪20年代提出的理论上。特别是,论文研究了这一理论的科学重要性的程度,并通过评估Zappa对意大利会计和商业思想发展的关键贡献(Ferraris Franceschi, 1994;Canziani, 1994;Mattessich & Galassi, 2004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信