Determination of Orthometric Heights of Points Using Gravimetric/GPS and Geodetic Levelling Approaches

Tata Herbert, Eteje S. O.
{"title":"Determination of Orthometric Heights of Points Using Gravimetric/GPS and Geodetic Levelling Approaches","authors":"Tata Herbert, Eteje S. O.","doi":"10.30897/ijegeo.899062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of practical, as well as orthometric heights in engineering cannot be underestimated as it is required for the determination of proposed construction levels and to direct the flow of water. This study presents the determination of orthometric heights of points using gravimetric/GPS and geodetic levelling approaches and compares the resolution of the two approaches to determine which of the methods is better for orthometric height determination in the study area. A total of 59 stations were occupy for gravity observation using Lacoste and Romberg (G-512 series) gravimeter to obtain the absolute gravity values of the points. GNSS observation was carried out in static mode using South GNSS receivers to obtain the positions and ellipsoidal heights of the points. The modified Stokes’ integral was applied to obtain the geoid heights of the points. Similarly, levelling was carried out using the geodetic level to obtain the level heights of the points. The orthometric correction was applied to the geodetic levelling results to obtain precise level heights of the points. The RMSE index was applied to compute the accuracy of the geoid models. The computed result shows that orthometric heights can be obtained in the study area using the two models with an accuracy of 0.3536m. Z-test was carried out to determine if there is any significant difference between the two methods. The test results show that statistically, there is no significant difference between the two methods. Hence, the two methods can be applied for orthometric heights determination in the study area.","PeriodicalId":176110,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.899062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The importance of practical, as well as orthometric heights in engineering cannot be underestimated as it is required for the determination of proposed construction levels and to direct the flow of water. This study presents the determination of orthometric heights of points using gravimetric/GPS and geodetic levelling approaches and compares the resolution of the two approaches to determine which of the methods is better for orthometric height determination in the study area. A total of 59 stations were occupy for gravity observation using Lacoste and Romberg (G-512 series) gravimeter to obtain the absolute gravity values of the points. GNSS observation was carried out in static mode using South GNSS receivers to obtain the positions and ellipsoidal heights of the points. The modified Stokes’ integral was applied to obtain the geoid heights of the points. Similarly, levelling was carried out using the geodetic level to obtain the level heights of the points. The orthometric correction was applied to the geodetic levelling results to obtain precise level heights of the points. The RMSE index was applied to compute the accuracy of the geoid models. The computed result shows that orthometric heights can be obtained in the study area using the two models with an accuracy of 0.3536m. Z-test was carried out to determine if there is any significant difference between the two methods. The test results show that statistically, there is no significant difference between the two methods. Hence, the two methods can be applied for orthometric heights determination in the study area.
利用重力/GPS和大地测量水准法确定点的正交高度
工程中实际高度和正交高度的重要性不可低估,因为它需要确定拟议的建筑水平和指导水流。本研究提出了使用重力/GPS和大地测量找平方法确定点的正交高度,并比较了两种方法的分辨率,以确定哪种方法更适合研究区域的正交高度确定。利用Lacoste和Romberg (G-512系列)重力仪,共占用59个站点进行重力观测,获取各测点的绝对重力值。利用South GNSS接收机在静态模式下进行GNSS观测,获取点的位置和椭球高度。利用修正的Stokes积分得到点的大地水准面高度。同样地,使用大地水准进行水准,以获得点的水平高度。对大地水准测量结果进行正交校正,得到精确的水准点高度。采用RMSE指数计算大地水准面模型的精度。计算结果表明,两种模型均可在研究区获得高精度高度,精度为0.3536m。进行z检验以确定两种方法之间是否存在显著差异。检验结果表明,在统计学上,两种方法之间没有显著差异。因此,这两种方法可以应用于研究区域的正交测高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信