Long Term Well Plug Integrity Assurance – A Probabilistic Approach

B. Willis, J. Strutt, R. Eden
{"title":"Long Term Well Plug Integrity Assurance – A Probabilistic Approach","authors":"B. Willis, J. Strutt, R. Eden","doi":"10.4043/29259-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Well plugging and abandonment (P&A) poses significant long-term risks for the industry with thousands of onshore and offshore wells requiring P&A in the coming decades. Historically, operators have typically followed a prescribed P&A approach to meet regulatory requirements. However, a risk-based approach allows bespoke abandonment strategies for individual wells, with the potential to reduce the time and effort needed for low-risk wells, while justifying any necessary additional P&A resources for managing higher risk wells. An advance computational risk-based, predictive well integrity model, STEM-flow, has been developed to support risk-based P&A and new plug technology qualification, and to compliment an extensive material test programme for structural bismuth alloys for plugging and abandonment and carried out as part of a collaborative research program.\n The model enables assessment of leak paths and leak rates with time, addressing multiple plugs and well barrier elements, degradation of barrier materials, cross-flow potential and reservoir re-pressurization. The mathematical model is based on a connectivity matrix, whose elements are effective permeability values, derived from well barrier models, which separate isolated pressurized zones, along a potential leak pathway. Key elements of the approach include the focus on fundamental models for barrier failure mechanisms and the handling of uncertain model parameters through Monte Carlo Simulation to calculate statistical life and probability of failure of plugs and complete well P&A designs. The paper outlines the approach employed by STEM-flow for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of different P&A designs, plugging technologies, cement plugs and new sealing materials such as creep resisting structural bismuth alloys. Two cases are studied, involving the prediction of plug life and overall life of a specific well P&A design. These cases compare a typical well P&A design for a subsea well in the Central North Sea using conventional cement barriers with that of structural bismuth alloy plugs under development.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29259-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Well plugging and abandonment (P&A) poses significant long-term risks for the industry with thousands of onshore and offshore wells requiring P&A in the coming decades. Historically, operators have typically followed a prescribed P&A approach to meet regulatory requirements. However, a risk-based approach allows bespoke abandonment strategies for individual wells, with the potential to reduce the time and effort needed for low-risk wells, while justifying any necessary additional P&A resources for managing higher risk wells. An advance computational risk-based, predictive well integrity model, STEM-flow, has been developed to support risk-based P&A and new plug technology qualification, and to compliment an extensive material test programme for structural bismuth alloys for plugging and abandonment and carried out as part of a collaborative research program. The model enables assessment of leak paths and leak rates with time, addressing multiple plugs and well barrier elements, degradation of barrier materials, cross-flow potential and reservoir re-pressurization. The mathematical model is based on a connectivity matrix, whose elements are effective permeability values, derived from well barrier models, which separate isolated pressurized zones, along a potential leak pathway. Key elements of the approach include the focus on fundamental models for barrier failure mechanisms and the handling of uncertain model parameters through Monte Carlo Simulation to calculate statistical life and probability of failure of plugs and complete well P&A designs. The paper outlines the approach employed by STEM-flow for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of different P&A designs, plugging technologies, cement plugs and new sealing materials such as creep resisting structural bismuth alloys. Two cases are studied, involving the prediction of plug life and overall life of a specific well P&A design. These cases compare a typical well P&A design for a subsea well in the Central North Sea using conventional cement barriers with that of structural bismuth alloy plugs under development.
长期井塞完整性保证——一种概率方法
在未来的几十年里,将有成千上万的陆上和海上油井需要封堵和弃井(P&A),这将给油气行业带来巨大的长期风险。过去,作业者通常遵循规定的P&A方法来满足监管要求。然而,基于风险的方法允许为单井定制弃井策略,有可能减少低风险井所需的时间和精力,同时为管理高风险井提供必要的额外P&A资源。该公司开发了一种先进的基于计算风险的预测井完整性模型——STEM-flow,以支持基于风险的封堵和新桥塞技术鉴定,并作为合作研究项目的一部分,补充了广泛的结构铋合金封堵和弃井材料测试项目。该模型能够评估泄漏路径和泄漏率随时间的变化,解决多个桥塞和井眼屏障元素、屏障材料的降解、跨流潜力和油藏再加压等问题。数学模型基于连通性矩阵,该矩阵的元素是有效渗透率值,有效渗透率值来源于井眼屏障模型,井眼屏障模型沿着潜在泄漏路径分隔出孤立的受压区域。该方法的关键要素包括关注屏障失效机制的基本模型,以及通过蒙特卡罗模拟来处理不确定模型参数,以计算桥塞的统计寿命和失效概率,并进行完井弃井设计。本文概述了STEM-flow用于评估和比较不同弃井设计、封堵技术、水泥塞和新型密封材料(如抗蠕变结构铋合金)的有效性的方法。本文研究了两个案例,分别涉及封堵桥塞寿命的预测和特定井封堵弃井设计的总体寿命。这些案例比较了北海中部海底油井使用常规水泥封隔器和正在开发的结构铋合金封隔器的典型弃井设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信