Repeated Refinement Approach to Bi-objective $p$-Location Problems

J. Janáček, Marek Kvet
{"title":"Repeated Refinement Approach to Bi-objective $p$-Location Problems","authors":"J. Janáček, Marek Kvet","doi":"10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the comparison of different solving techniques for bi-objective $p$-location problems, which can be met very often in many areas of human life including also the health sector and rescue services. Making the final decision on service center locations is usually a complex challenge mainly due to several years' impact on the efficiency of the service provided. Moreover, any good or bad decision directly affects the accessibility of urgent care in case of emergency. From this point of view, the optimal service center deployment can be formulated as a bi- or multi-criteria decision-making problem. While obtaining the result of the problem with one objective function follows from solving a simple model, usage of more parallel quality criteria implies the construction of the Pareto front or at least of its approximation. In this paper, we deal with five different heuristic algorithms for processing the solutions of the current set of non-dominated solutions in order to choose the most suitable approach for practice. Suggested theoretical ideas will be studied on the dataset from real Emergency Medical Service System in Slovakia.","PeriodicalId":253486,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INES56734.2022.9922620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper deals with the comparison of different solving techniques for bi-objective $p$-location problems, which can be met very often in many areas of human life including also the health sector and rescue services. Making the final decision on service center locations is usually a complex challenge mainly due to several years' impact on the efficiency of the service provided. Moreover, any good or bad decision directly affects the accessibility of urgent care in case of emergency. From this point of view, the optimal service center deployment can be formulated as a bi- or multi-criteria decision-making problem. While obtaining the result of the problem with one objective function follows from solving a simple model, usage of more parallel quality criteria implies the construction of the Pareto front or at least of its approximation. In this paper, we deal with five different heuristic algorithms for processing the solutions of the current set of non-dominated solutions in order to choose the most suitable approach for practice. Suggested theoretical ideas will be studied on the dataset from real Emergency Medical Service System in Slovakia.
双目标$p$-定位问题的重复改进方法
本文比较了双目标位置问题的不同解决技术,这些问题在人类生活的许多领域,包括卫生部门和救援服务中经常遇到。对服务中心的位置做出最终决定通常是一项复杂的挑战,主要是因为所提供服务的效率会受到数年的影响。此外,任何好的或坏的决定都直接影响到在紧急情况下获得紧急护理的机会。从这个角度来看,服务中心的最优部署可以被表述为一个双准则或多准则决策问题。通过求解一个简单的模型可以得到一个目标函数问题的结果,而使用更多的并行质量准则意味着构建帕累托前沿或至少是其近似。在本文中,我们讨论了五种不同的启发式算法来处理当前非支配解集的解,以便选择最适合实践的方法。建议的理论思路将在斯洛伐克实际紧急医疗服务系统数据集上进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信