Wheat Yield Prediction with Machine Learning based on MODIS and Landsat NDVI Data at Field Scale

M. Tuğaç, A. M. Özbayoğlu, Harun Torunlar, Erol Karakurt
{"title":"Wheat Yield Prediction with Machine Learning based on MODIS and Landsat NDVI Data at Field Scale","authors":"M. Tuğaç, A. M. Özbayoğlu, Harun Torunlar, Erol Karakurt","doi":"10.30897/ijegeo.1128985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of wheat yield using Remote Sensing-based models is critical in determining the effects of agricultural drought and sustainable food planning. In this study, Winter wheat yield was estimated for large fields and producer fields by applying Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) based linear models (simple linear regression and multiple linear regression) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques (support vector machine_svm, multilayer perceptron_mlp, random forest_rf). In this study, depending on the ecological zone, crop sampling was carried out from 380 rainfed parcels where wheat was planted. On the basis of crop development periods (CDP), the highest correlation between NDVI and yield occurred during the flowering period. In this period, coefficient of determination (R2) was 63% in TIGEM fields and 50% in producer fields for MODIS data, and 61% and 65% for Landsat data, respectively. In TIGEM fields, the best prediction performance was obtained with the MLP model for MODIS (RMSE:0.23-0.65 t/ha) and Landsat (RMSE: 0.28-0.64 t/ha). On the other hand, the highest forecasting accuracy was acquired with the SVM model in producer fields. The RMSE values ranged from 0.74 to 0.80 t/ha for MODIS and 0.51 to 0.60 t/ha for Landsat 8. The error value obtained with MODIS was approximately 1.4 times higher than the Landsat 8 data in producer fields. For yield estimation, the best estimation can be made 4-6 weeks before the harvest. In regional yield estimations, satellite-based ML techniques outperformed linear models. ML models have shown that it can play an important role in crop yield prediction. In crop yield estimation, it is a priority to consider the impact of climate change and ecological differences on crop development.","PeriodicalId":176110,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1128985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of wheat yield using Remote Sensing-based models is critical in determining the effects of agricultural drought and sustainable food planning. In this study, Winter wheat yield was estimated for large fields and producer fields by applying Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) based linear models (simple linear regression and multiple linear regression) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques (support vector machine_svm, multilayer perceptron_mlp, random forest_rf). In this study, depending on the ecological zone, crop sampling was carried out from 380 rainfed parcels where wheat was planted. On the basis of crop development periods (CDP), the highest correlation between NDVI and yield occurred during the flowering period. In this period, coefficient of determination (R2) was 63% in TIGEM fields and 50% in producer fields for MODIS data, and 61% and 65% for Landsat data, respectively. In TIGEM fields, the best prediction performance was obtained with the MLP model for MODIS (RMSE:0.23-0.65 t/ha) and Landsat (RMSE: 0.28-0.64 t/ha). On the other hand, the highest forecasting accuracy was acquired with the SVM model in producer fields. The RMSE values ranged from 0.74 to 0.80 t/ha for MODIS and 0.51 to 0.60 t/ha for Landsat 8. The error value obtained with MODIS was approximately 1.4 times higher than the Landsat 8 data in producer fields. For yield estimation, the best estimation can be made 4-6 weeks before the harvest. In regional yield estimations, satellite-based ML techniques outperformed linear models. ML models have shown that it can play an important role in crop yield prediction. In crop yield estimation, it is a priority to consider the impact of climate change and ecological differences on crop development.
基于 MODIS 和 Landsat NDVI 数据的田间尺度机器学习小麦产量预测
使用基于遥感的模型对小麦产量进行精确估算,对于确定农业干旱的影响和可持续粮食规划至关重要。在本研究中,通过应用基于归一化植被指数(NDVI)的线性模型(简单线性回归和多元线性回归)和机器学习(ML)技术(支持向量机_svm、多层感知器_mlp、随机森林_rf),对大田和生产者田块的冬小麦产量进行了估算。在这项研究中,根据生态区的不同,对种植小麦的 380 块雨水灌溉地块进行了作物取样。根据作物生长期(CDP),NDVI 与产量的最高相关性出现在开花期。在这一时期,MODIS 数据的判定系数(R2)在 TIGEM 田为 63%,在生产者田为 50%,Landsat 数据的判定系数(R2)分别为 61%和 65%。在 TIGEM 农田中,MLP 模型对 MODIS(均方根误差:0.23-0.65 吨/公顷)和 Landsat(均方根误差:0.28-0.64 吨/公顷)的预测效果最好。另一方面,SVM 模型在生产者田间的预测精度最高。MODIS 的 RMSE 值为 0.74 至 0.80 吨/公顷,Landsat 8 的 RMSE 值为 0.51 至 0.60 吨/公顷。在产量估算方面,最好在收获前 4-6 周进行估算。在区域产量估算中,基于卫星的 ML 技术优于线性模型。ML 模型表明,它可以在作物产量预测中发挥重要作用。在作物产量估算中,优先考虑气候变化和生态差异对作物生长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信