Policy management in airborne tactical networks

G. Kuthethoor, P. Sesha, J. Strohm, P. O'Neal, G. Hadynski, D. Climek, J. Delmedico, D. Kiwior, D. Dunbrack, D. Parker
{"title":"Policy management in airborne tactical networks","authors":"G. Kuthethoor, P. Sesha, J. Strohm, P. O'Neal, G. Hadynski, D. Climek, J. Delmedico, D. Kiwior, D. Dunbrack, D. Parker","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy management in a traditional IP network is accomplished by employing Policy Enforcement Points (PEP) and Policy Decision Points (PDP). Policy management has a configuration model and an outsourcing model. In a configuration model, a PDP will send new policies to a PEP to enforce. In an outsourcing model, a PEP will contact a PDP for a decision as to admit or deny traffic. In dynamic airborne tactical edge networks, fast-moving aircraft and terrain obscuration combine to create conditions where traditional policy management may be less effective to be deployed and fielded. In this paper, we study the efficacy of the configuration model in a dynamic Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) by trying to answer the following questions: How quickly can we rectify a network problem by deploying new policies? Is it possible to deploy a new policy if the problem restricts communication between PDP and PEP? We will also study a case where a PEP will contact a PDP to decide on granting or denying a resource reservation request as applicable to the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP). This study will also consider the usage of advanced and aggregated RSVP (A-RSVP and AR-RSVP) protocols for making resource reservations. Modifications to the policy enforcement algorithms will be proposed to improve and meet end-to-end Service Level Agreements. The performance analysis in a simulation environment will be conducted for various tactical edge network scenarios.","PeriodicalId":434891,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Policy management in a traditional IP network is accomplished by employing Policy Enforcement Points (PEP) and Policy Decision Points (PDP). Policy management has a configuration model and an outsourcing model. In a configuration model, a PDP will send new policies to a PEP to enforce. In an outsourcing model, a PEP will contact a PDP for a decision as to admit or deny traffic. In dynamic airborne tactical edge networks, fast-moving aircraft and terrain obscuration combine to create conditions where traditional policy management may be less effective to be deployed and fielded. In this paper, we study the efficacy of the configuration model in a dynamic Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) by trying to answer the following questions: How quickly can we rectify a network problem by deploying new policies? Is it possible to deploy a new policy if the problem restricts communication between PDP and PEP? We will also study a case where a PEP will contact a PDP to decide on granting or denying a resource reservation request as applicable to the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP). This study will also consider the usage of advanced and aggregated RSVP (A-RSVP and AR-RSVP) protocols for making resource reservations. Modifications to the policy enforcement algorithms will be proposed to improve and meet end-to-end Service Level Agreements. The performance analysis in a simulation environment will be conducted for various tactical edge network scenarios.
空中战术网络中的策略管理
传统IP网络中的策略管理是通过策略实施点(PEP)和策略决策点(PDP)实现的。策略管理有一个配置模型和一个外包模型。在配置模型中,PDP将把新策略发送给PEP执行。在外包模型中,PEP将与PDP联系以决定允许或拒绝流量。在动态机载战术边缘网络中,快速移动的飞机和地形遮挡相结合,创造了传统政策管理可能不太有效部署和部署的条件。在本文中,我们通过尝试回答以下问题来研究配置模型在动态移动自组织网络(MANET)中的有效性:我们通过部署新策略来纠正网络问题的速度有多快?如果问题限制了PDP和PEP之间的通信,是否有可能部署新的策略?我们还将研究一种情况,在这种情况下,PEP将与PDP联系,以决定是否批准或拒绝适用于资源保留协议(RSVP)的资源保留请求。本研究还将考虑使用高级和聚合RSVP (A-RSVP和AR-RSVP)协议进行资源预订。将提出对策略实施算法的修改,以改进和满足端到端服务水平协议。仿真环境中的性能分析将针对各种战术边缘网络场景进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信