More on the Cause-Effect Sequence

J. Janik
{"title":"More on the Cause-Effect Sequence","authors":"J. Janik","doi":"10.2478/V10005-007-0011-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does every event have a cause? An answer is not simple. The notion of cause contains a particular being y acting on being x plus everything that may be called the boundary conditions. These may form necessary and sufficient conditions giving rise to a strong cause, or only necessary conditions, giving rise to a weak cause. These matters are discussed in this article with particular attention being paid to the argumentation of Thomas Aquinas known as prima via. Prima via is the analysis of a cause-effect sequence which leads (according to Thomas) to a First Cause (First Mover). It seems that the extrapolation of the cause-effect sequence to infinity is permissible from the logical point of view. But the possibility of weak causes seems to destroy the cause-effect “line”. Here it is perhaps useful to “escape” to the metaphysical abstraction which looks at things sub ratione entitatis. If we ignore space and time (which is characteristic Concepts of Physics, Vol. IV, No. 2 (2007) DOI: 10.2478/v10005-007-0011-1 303 of this abstraction) we are led to believe that the IS of cause is finally unavoidable, which means that from the vantage point of this abstraction, i.e. from the point of view of IS, all causes","PeriodicalId":249199,"journal":{"name":"Old and New Concepts of Physics","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Old and New Concepts of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/V10005-007-0011-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does every event have a cause? An answer is not simple. The notion of cause contains a particular being y acting on being x plus everything that may be called the boundary conditions. These may form necessary and sufficient conditions giving rise to a strong cause, or only necessary conditions, giving rise to a weak cause. These matters are discussed in this article with particular attention being paid to the argumentation of Thomas Aquinas known as prima via. Prima via is the analysis of a cause-effect sequence which leads (according to Thomas) to a First Cause (First Mover). It seems that the extrapolation of the cause-effect sequence to infinity is permissible from the logical point of view. But the possibility of weak causes seems to destroy the cause-effect “line”. Here it is perhaps useful to “escape” to the metaphysical abstraction which looks at things sub ratione entitatis. If we ignore space and time (which is characteristic Concepts of Physics, Vol. IV, No. 2 (2007) DOI: 10.2478/v10005-007-0011-1 303 of this abstraction) we are led to believe that the IS of cause is finally unavoidable, which means that from the vantage point of this abstraction, i.e. from the point of view of IS, all causes
更多关于因果顺序
每件事都有原因吗?答案并不简单。原因的概念包含一个特定的存在y作用于x加上一切可以称为边界条件的东西。这些可能形成产生强因的充分必要条件,也可能形成产生弱因的必要条件。这些问题将在本文中讨论,特别关注托马斯·阿奎那的论证,即所谓的先验。先验是对因果序列的分析,根据托马斯的说法,这种分析会导致第一原因(先行者)。从逻辑的观点来看,似乎因果序列的外推到无限是允许的。但弱原因的可能性似乎破坏了因果“线”。在这里,“逃避”到形而上学的抽象,即从理性实体来看事物,也许是有用的。如果我们忽略空间和时间(这是《物理学概念》的特征,Vol. IV, No. 2 (2007) DOI: 10.2478/v10005-007-0011-1 303 of the abstract),我们就会被引导去相信原因之本体最终是不可避免的,这意味着从这个抽象的有利位置来看,即从is的观点来看,所有的原因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信