B School, E School, or D School: Does Entrepreneurship Program Location Matter or is it the Ecosystem that Counts?

J. Hornsby
{"title":"B School, E School, or D School: Does Entrepreneurship Program Location Matter or is it the Ecosystem that Counts?","authors":"J. Hornsby","doi":"10.1108/S1048-473620170000027011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There has been an ongoing debate regarding where a university should house entrepreneurship programs. Should they be in the business school, at the central administration level, or housed in another college such as engineering? Many argue that the entrepreneurship programs should be housed where the best ideas come from (i.e., engineering, computer science, or biosciences). Others strongly argue on traditional lines that entrepreneurship involves essential business tools so the programs need to be housed there. This chapter asserts that the debate over location is moot in regards to how to more effectively launch start-ups and create entrepreneurial talent. For a university to be effective, it needs to build an ecosystem that integrates programs, people, and ideas from across the campus and avoid the traditional silos that schools and colleges create. A model for this from the University of Missouri-Kansas City is used to illustrate an effective university entrepreneurial ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":108758,"journal":{"name":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-473620170000027011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract There has been an ongoing debate regarding where a university should house entrepreneurship programs. Should they be in the business school, at the central administration level, or housed in another college such as engineering? Many argue that the entrepreneurship programs should be housed where the best ideas come from (i.e., engineering, computer science, or biosciences). Others strongly argue on traditional lines that entrepreneurship involves essential business tools so the programs need to be housed there. This chapter asserts that the debate over location is moot in regards to how to more effectively launch start-ups and create entrepreneurial talent. For a university to be effective, it needs to build an ecosystem that integrates programs, people, and ideas from across the campus and avoid the traditional silos that schools and colleges create. A model for this from the University of Missouri-Kansas City is used to illustrate an effective university entrepreneurial ecosystem.
B校、E校、D校:创业项目地点重要还是生态系统重要?
关于大学应该在哪里设立创业项目一直存在争议。他们应该在商学院、在中央管理部门工作,还是在其他学院(比如工程学院)工作?许多人认为,创业项目应该安置在最好的想法来自的地方(即工程、计算机科学或生物科学)。另一些人则坚持传统的观点,认为创业涉及基本的商业工具,所以项目需要设在那里。本章断言,关于如何更有效地启动初创企业和创造创业人才,关于地点的争论是没有意义的。一所大学要想有效,就需要建立一个生态系统,将整个校园的项目、人员和想法整合在一起,避免学校和大学创造的传统孤岛。本文采用了密苏里大学堪萨斯城分校(University of Missouri-Kansas City)的一个模型来说明一个有效的大学创业生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信