{"title":"Harvey Milk’s (sexual and sacred) body","authors":"William K. Gilders","doi":"10.1558/bar.15678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harvey Milk has been constituted as a queer saint. This article, in the selfidentifying voice of a gay man, explores the significance of Harvey Milk’s queer cultural sanctity in relation to his sexual embodiment, emphasizing that ‘Saint Harvey’ was a leading figure in a movement of sexual liberation and was himself a strongly sexual being, facts sometimes downplayed in his representation as a sacred figure in contrast with his vitally sexual pre-assassination body. Examining the phenomenon of the ‘canonization’ of a sexually embodied gay Jewish agnostic, the article asks what happens when Milk’s sacralization is explicitly tied to his sexuality, focusing on a central question: can a saint be a sexual being, not peripherally or incidentally, but centrally and essentially?","PeriodicalId":247531,"journal":{"name":"Body and Religion","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.15678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Harvey Milk has been constituted as a queer saint. This article, in the selfidentifying voice of a gay man, explores the significance of Harvey Milk’s queer cultural sanctity in relation to his sexual embodiment, emphasizing that ‘Saint Harvey’ was a leading figure in a movement of sexual liberation and was himself a strongly sexual being, facts sometimes downplayed in his representation as a sacred figure in contrast with his vitally sexual pre-assassination body. Examining the phenomenon of the ‘canonization’ of a sexually embodied gay Jewish agnostic, the article asks what happens when Milk’s sacralization is explicitly tied to his sexuality, focusing on a central question: can a saint be a sexual being, not peripherally or incidentally, but centrally and essentially?