Relationship-Based Access Control for an Open-Source Medical Records System

Syed Zain R. Rizvi, Philip W. L. Fong, J. Crampton, J. Sellwood
{"title":"Relationship-Based Access Control for an Open-Source Medical Records System","authors":"Syed Zain R. Rizvi, Philip W. L. Fong, J. Crampton, J. Sellwood","doi":"10.1145/2752952.2752962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the access control models of social network systems, Relationship-Based Access Control (ReBAC) was recently proposed as a general-purpose access control paradigm for application domains in which authorization must take into account the relationship between the access requestor and the resource owner. The healthcare domain is envisioned to be an archetypical application domain in which ReBAC is sorely needed: e.g., my patient record should be accessible only by my family doctor, but not by all doctors. In this work, we demonstrate for the first time that ReBAC can be incorporated into a production-scale medical records system, OpenMRS, with backward compatibility to the legacy RBAC mechanism. Specifically, we extend the access control mechanism of OpenMRS to enforce ReBAC policies. Our extensions incorporate and extend advanced ReBAC features recently proposed by Crampton and Sellwood. In addition, we designed and implemented the first administrative model for ReBAC. In this paper, we describe our ReBAC implementation, discuss the system engineering lessons learnt as a result, and evaluate the experimental work we have undertaken. In particular, we compare the performance of the various authorization schemes we implemented, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of ReBAC.","PeriodicalId":305802,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2752952.2752962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Inspired by the access control models of social network systems, Relationship-Based Access Control (ReBAC) was recently proposed as a general-purpose access control paradigm for application domains in which authorization must take into account the relationship between the access requestor and the resource owner. The healthcare domain is envisioned to be an archetypical application domain in which ReBAC is sorely needed: e.g., my patient record should be accessible only by my family doctor, but not by all doctors. In this work, we demonstrate for the first time that ReBAC can be incorporated into a production-scale medical records system, OpenMRS, with backward compatibility to the legacy RBAC mechanism. Specifically, we extend the access control mechanism of OpenMRS to enforce ReBAC policies. Our extensions incorporate and extend advanced ReBAC features recently proposed by Crampton and Sellwood. In addition, we designed and implemented the first administrative model for ReBAC. In this paper, we describe our ReBAC implementation, discuss the system engineering lessons learnt as a result, and evaluate the experimental work we have undertaken. In particular, we compare the performance of the various authorization schemes we implemented, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of ReBAC.
基于关系的开放源代码病历系统访问控制
受社会网络系统访问控制模型的启发,基于关系的访问控制(ReBAC)最近被提出作为应用程序领域的通用访问控制范式,其中授权必须考虑访问请求者和资源所有者之间的关系。医疗保健领域被设想为一个非常需要ReBAC的典型应用程序领域:例如,我的病人记录应该只有我的家庭医生才能访问,而不是所有的医生都可以访问。在这项工作中,我们首次证明了ReBAC可以合并到生产规模的医疗记录系统OpenMRS中,并向后兼容遗留的RBAC机制。具体来说,我们扩展了OpenMRS的访问控制机制来执行ReBAC策略。我们的扩展合并并扩展了最近由Crampton和Sellwood提出的高级ReBAC功能。此外,我们设计并实现了ReBAC的第一个管理模型。在本文中,我们描述了我们的ReBAC实现,讨论了由此得到的系统工程经验教训,并评估了我们所进行的实验工作。特别是,我们比较了我们实现的各种授权方案的性能,从而证明了ReBAC的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信