Insulin resistance in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: effect of short-term erythropoietin therapy

H. Kasem, W. Shehab-Eldin, Islam Shebl, A. Sonbol, Mai A. Kamel
{"title":"Insulin resistance in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: effect of short-term erythropoietin therapy","authors":"H. Kasem, W. Shehab-Eldin, Islam Shebl, A. Sonbol, Mai A. Kamel","doi":"10.4103/jesnt.jesnt_25_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic feature of uremia. Both IR and metabolic syndrome are considered independent predictors for cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. Few studies have shown a favorable effect of erythropoietin (EPO) in decreasing IR. We hypothesized that short-term treatment with EPO can lead to improvement of IR in patients with chronic kidney disease. Patients and methods Patients were categorized into two groups: 20 hemodialysis patients (HDP) not receiving EPO (control) compared with other 40 HDP divided into two subgroups (20 diabetics and 20 nondiabetic), both receiving EPO (intervention group) all over the duration of the study, which extended for 6 months. All patients were subjected to history taking, full clinical examination, as well as laboratory investigations. Results All baseline results of parameters of glycemic control showed significant stepwise increase from nondiabetic intervention group, to control group, and then to diabetic intervention group. homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was 1.64±0.88, 6.14±0.46, and then 10.78±2.84, respectively. On comparing the results before and after EPO therapy in both intervention groups, there was a significant improvement in IR in both groups. HOMA-IR was 10.78±2.84 and 5.52±161 (P<0.001) before and after intervention, respectively, for diabetic patients, whereas it was 1.64±0.88 and 0.8±0.28 (P<0.001) before and after intervention, respectively, for nondiabetic patients. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting insulin level, as well as fasting and postprandial glucose measurements, all in both preintervension and postintervention settings were independent predictors for HOMA-IR after intervention in all 40 patients of both intervention groups. Conclusion EPO treatment in HDPs is followed by improvement of IR in diabetic as well as nondiabetic patients with end-stage kidney disease and on hemodialysis.","PeriodicalId":285751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Egyptian Society of Nephrology and Transplantation","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Egyptian Society of Nephrology and Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jesnt.jesnt_25_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Insulin resistance (IR) is a characteristic feature of uremia. Both IR and metabolic syndrome are considered independent predictors for cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. Few studies have shown a favorable effect of erythropoietin (EPO) in decreasing IR. We hypothesized that short-term treatment with EPO can lead to improvement of IR in patients with chronic kidney disease. Patients and methods Patients were categorized into two groups: 20 hemodialysis patients (HDP) not receiving EPO (control) compared with other 40 HDP divided into two subgroups (20 diabetics and 20 nondiabetic), both receiving EPO (intervention group) all over the duration of the study, which extended for 6 months. All patients were subjected to history taking, full clinical examination, as well as laboratory investigations. Results All baseline results of parameters of glycemic control showed significant stepwise increase from nondiabetic intervention group, to control group, and then to diabetic intervention group. homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was 1.64±0.88, 6.14±0.46, and then 10.78±2.84, respectively. On comparing the results before and after EPO therapy in both intervention groups, there was a significant improvement in IR in both groups. HOMA-IR was 10.78±2.84 and 5.52±161 (P<0.001) before and after intervention, respectively, for diabetic patients, whereas it was 1.64±0.88 and 0.8±0.28 (P<0.001) before and after intervention, respectively, for nondiabetic patients. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting insulin level, as well as fasting and postprandial glucose measurements, all in both preintervension and postintervention settings were independent predictors for HOMA-IR after intervention in all 40 patients of both intervention groups. Conclusion EPO treatment in HDPs is followed by improvement of IR in diabetic as well as nondiabetic patients with end-stage kidney disease and on hemodialysis.
终末期肾病血液透析患者的胰岛素抵抗:短期促红细胞生成素治疗的效果
胰岛素抵抗(IR)是尿毒症的一个特征性特征。IR和代谢综合征被认为是慢性肾病患者心血管事件和死亡率的独立预测因子。很少有研究显示促红细胞生成素(EPO)在降低IR中的有利作用。我们假设短期使用EPO治疗可以改善慢性肾脏疾病患者的IR。患者和方法将患者分为两组:20例血液透析患者(HDP)未接受EPO治疗(对照组),其余40例HDP患者分为两个亚组(糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者各20例),在研究期间均接受EPO治疗(干预组),研究持续6个月。所有患者均接受病史记录、全面临床检查和实验室检查。结果血糖控制各项指标基线值从非糖尿病干预组到对照组,再到糖尿病干预组均呈显著性逐步升高。胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)分别为1.64±0.88、6.14±0.46和10.78±2.84。比较两组EPO治疗前后的结果,两组IR均有显著改善。糖尿病患者干预前后HOMA-IR分别为10.78±2.84、5.52±161 (P<0.001),非糖尿病患者干预前后HOMA-IR分别为1.64±0.88、0.8±0.28 (P<0.001)。干预前和干预后的糖化血红蛋白、空腹胰岛素水平以及空腹和餐后血糖测量都是干预后HOMA-IR的独立预测因子。结论EPO治疗HDPs后,糖尿病、非糖尿病终末期肾病患者及血液透析患者IR均有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书