Comparison of Implant Failure between Cement Augmented Cannulated Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws and Associated Risk Factors in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Pilot Study

S. Choi, J. M. Hur, Jooyoung You, Chang-Nam Kang
{"title":"Comparison of Implant Failure between Cement Augmented Cannulated Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws and Associated Risk Factors in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Pilot Study","authors":"S. Choi, J. M. Hur, Jooyoung You, Chang-Nam Kang","doi":"10.4184/jkss.2020.27.3.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Design: Retrospective pilot study Objectives: To compare and analyze the rate and risk factors of implant failure according to the use of solid pedicle screws or cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar fusion surgery. Summary of Literature Review: In previous studies, the use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws was found to improve the pull-out strength and to reduce the risk of implant failure in patients with osteoporosis. However, the clinical risk factors for implant failure have not been established. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 177 patients with spine fracture and degenerative thoracolumbar disease were included in a retrospective study, and the patients underwent spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws. Solid pedicle screws were used in 118 patients and cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws were used in 59 patients. During the follow-up period, simple radiography and computed tomography were performed to evaluate cases of implant failure, including pedicle screw loosening, migration, and pull-out, and to analyze risk factors for implant failure. Implant failures were observed in 21 patients (11.9%, 21/177) during the follow-up period. Of the 21 patients with implant failure, 18 were in the solid pedicle screw group (15.3%, 18/118), and 3 patients were in the cement augmented cannulated pedicle screw group (5.1%, 3/59). The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Age over 65 years, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), chronic kidney disease, and steroid use (<0.05) were statistically significantly more common in patients who experienced implant failure. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, age over 65 (odds ratio, 4.47; p=0.032), osteoporosis (odds ratio, 3.68; p=0.017), autoimmune disease (odds ratio, 3.59; p=0.039), and chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 4.67; p=0.043) were statistically significant risk factors for implant failure. Conclusions: Patients underwent thoracolumbar fusion who were over 65 years of age, had osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, or autoimmune disease showed a high implant failure rate. The use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws might be an effective method to significantly decrease the likelihood of implant failure in patients with these risk factors.","PeriodicalId":430424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2020.27.3.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective pilot study Objectives: To compare and analyze the rate and risk factors of implant failure according to the use of solid pedicle screws or cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar fusion surgery. Summary of Literature Review: In previous studies, the use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws was found to improve the pull-out strength and to reduce the risk of implant failure in patients with osteoporosis. However, the clinical risk factors for implant failure have not been established. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 177 patients with spine fracture and degenerative thoracolumbar disease were included in a retrospective study, and the patients underwent spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws. Solid pedicle screws were used in 118 patients and cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws were used in 59 patients. During the follow-up period, simple radiography and computed tomography were performed to evaluate cases of implant failure, including pedicle screw loosening, migration, and pull-out, and to analyze risk factors for implant failure. Implant failures were observed in 21 patients (11.9%, 21/177) during the follow-up period. Of the 21 patients with implant failure, 18 were in the solid pedicle screw group (15.3%, 18/118), and 3 patients were in the cement augmented cannulated pedicle screw group (5.1%, 3/59). The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Age over 65 years, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), chronic kidney disease, and steroid use (<0.05) were statistically significantly more common in patients who experienced implant failure. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, age over 65 (odds ratio, 4.47; p=0.032), osteoporosis (odds ratio, 3.68; p=0.017), autoimmune disease (odds ratio, 3.59; p=0.039), and chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 4.67; p=0.043) were statistically significant risk factors for implant failure. Conclusions: Patients underwent thoracolumbar fusion who were over 65 years of age, had osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, or autoimmune disease showed a high implant failure rate. The use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws might be an effective method to significantly decrease the likelihood of implant failure in patients with these risk factors.
腰椎融合术中水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉与实心椎弓根螺钉植入失败及相关危险因素的比较:一项初步研究
研究设计:回顾性先导研究目的:比较分析腰椎融合手术中使用实心椎弓根螺钉或水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉的失败率及危险因素。文献综述:在以往的研究中发现,骨质疏松患者使用水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉可提高其拔出强度,降低种植体失败的风险。然而,种植体失败的临床危险因素尚未确定。材料与方法:2016年1月至2018年12月,回顾性研究177例脊柱骨折合并退行性胸腰椎疾病患者,采用椎弓根螺钉行脊柱融合手术。118例患者使用实心椎弓根螺钉,59例患者使用水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉。在随访期间,通过简单的x线摄影和计算机断层扫描来评估种植体失败的病例,包括椎弓根螺钉松动、移位和拔出,并分析种植体失败的危险因素。在随访期间,21例患者(11.9%,21/177)出现种植体失败。21例假体失败患者中,实椎弓根螺钉组18例(15.3%,18/118),水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉组3例(5.1%,3/59)。差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。年龄大于65岁、骨质疏松、自身免疫性疾病(类风湿关节炎、系统性红斑狼疮等)、慢性肾脏疾病、类固醇使用(<0.05)在种植体失败患者中更为常见,差异有统计学意义。在多元logistic回归分析中,年龄大于65岁(优势比4.47;P =0.032),骨质疏松症(优势比3.68;P =0.017),自身免疫性疾病(优势比3.59;P =0.039)和慢性肾脏疾病(优势比4.67;P =0.043)是种植体失败的有统计学意义的危险因素。结论:65岁以上、骨质疏松、慢性肾脏疾病或自身免疫性疾病的胸腰椎融合患者植入物失败率高。对于有这些危险因素的患者,使用水泥增强空心椎弓根螺钉可能是一种有效的方法,可以显著降低种植体失败的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信