Please Fill in Your Manuscript Title. Impacts of Perforating and Hydraulic Re-Fracturing on Expandable Casing Patches

Michael Kraynek, J. Miskimins, A. Eustes, D. Joshi, Mark Balderston
{"title":"Please Fill in Your Manuscript Title. Impacts of Perforating and Hydraulic Re-Fracturing on Expandable Casing Patches","authors":"Michael Kraynek, J. Miskimins, A. Eustes, D. Joshi, Mark Balderston","doi":"10.2118/212332-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Re-fracturing is a common technique to ensure the maximum recovery from low-permeability, unconventional reservoirs. Generally in such reservoir systems, optimal gains are made from treating new areas of the reservoir that were unstimulated during the initial completion. To be successful under such circumstances, diversion away from depleted sections of the wellbore is critical. This paper discusses laboratory testing and subsequent finite element modeling (FEM) of full-length expandable casing patches deployed in several refracturing treatments in the Denver-Julesburg Basin, Colorado.\n Short sections of casing patches were deployed in 4.5′, 13.5# casing. These sections included unanchored and anchored patch components. One type of each section (anchored and unanchored) was then perforated with a full-size perforating gun, 4 shot each section, 90° phasing. The perforating took place at the Edgar Mine Testing Facility in Idaho Springs, Colorado. Both the anchored and unanchored, perforated and unperforated, patch/casing sections were then push/pull-tested to determine friction factors and the impacts of the perforating on the patch/casing interface. These results were then incorporated into FEM modeling to determine the ability of the full-size, field-deployed patch to remain stationary and the impact such would have on perforation alignment during treatment conditions.\n Both the push/pull tests and the subsequent FEM modeling suggest that the full-length casing patch exhibits only a minimal shift during the application of the forces associated with the hydraulic fracturing process. Some miss-alignment of perforations may occur but not to the level that they negatively impact the treatment success. These results align with the field trials which indicate positive re-fracturing treatment results. This unique project tested the viability of full-length casing patches in the refracturing process and incorporated laboratory testing of the casing-casing patch interfaces under both perforated and unperforated into FEM modeling, with comparison to field results. This process provides a full cycle analysis of the re-fracturing process using this diversion technique.","PeriodicalId":402242,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212332-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Re-fracturing is a common technique to ensure the maximum recovery from low-permeability, unconventional reservoirs. Generally in such reservoir systems, optimal gains are made from treating new areas of the reservoir that were unstimulated during the initial completion. To be successful under such circumstances, diversion away from depleted sections of the wellbore is critical. This paper discusses laboratory testing and subsequent finite element modeling (FEM) of full-length expandable casing patches deployed in several refracturing treatments in the Denver-Julesburg Basin, Colorado. Short sections of casing patches were deployed in 4.5′, 13.5# casing. These sections included unanchored and anchored patch components. One type of each section (anchored and unanchored) was then perforated with a full-size perforating gun, 4 shot each section, 90° phasing. The perforating took place at the Edgar Mine Testing Facility in Idaho Springs, Colorado. Both the anchored and unanchored, perforated and unperforated, patch/casing sections were then push/pull-tested to determine friction factors and the impacts of the perforating on the patch/casing interface. These results were then incorporated into FEM modeling to determine the ability of the full-size, field-deployed patch to remain stationary and the impact such would have on perforation alignment during treatment conditions. Both the push/pull tests and the subsequent FEM modeling suggest that the full-length casing patch exhibits only a minimal shift during the application of the forces associated with the hydraulic fracturing process. Some miss-alignment of perforations may occur but not to the level that they negatively impact the treatment success. These results align with the field trials which indicate positive re-fracturing treatment results. This unique project tested the viability of full-length casing patches in the refracturing process and incorporated laboratory testing of the casing-casing patch interfaces under both perforated and unperforated into FEM modeling, with comparison to field results. This process provides a full cycle analysis of the re-fracturing process using this diversion technique.
请填写稿件标题。射孔和水力再压裂对可膨胀套管补丁的影响
重新压裂是确保低渗透非常规油藏最大采收率的常用技术。一般来说,在这种油藏系统中,通过对初始完井过程中未进行增产的新区域进行处理,可以获得最佳的增产效果。为了在这种情况下取得成功,从井筒的枯竭部分转移是至关重要的。本文讨论了在科罗拉多州Denver-Julesburg盆地多次重复压裂中使用的全长度可膨胀套管补丁的实验室测试和随后的有限元建模(FEM)。在4.5 '、13.5#套管中部署了短段套管补片。这些部分包括非锚定和锚定补丁组件。然后使用全尺寸射孔枪对每一段(锚定和非锚定)进行射孔,每段射孔4次,90°相位。射孔作业在科罗拉多州爱达荷斯普林斯的埃德加矿山测试设施进行。然后对锚定和未锚定、射孔和未射孔、贴片/套管段进行推拉测试,以确定摩擦系数以及射孔对贴片/套管界面的影响。然后将这些结果整合到FEM模型中,以确定现场部署的全尺寸贴片保持静止的能力,以及在处理条件下对射孔对准的影响。推/拉测试和随后的有限元模型都表明,在水力压裂过程中,在施加与水力压裂相关的力时,全长套管补丁仅表现出最小的位移。可能会出现一些穿孔错位,但不会对治疗成功产生负面影响。这些结果与现场试验结果一致,表明了积极的再压裂处理效果。这个独特的项目测试了重复压裂过程中全长度套管补片的可行性,并将射孔和未射孔情况下的套管-套管补片界面的实验室测试纳入有限元模型,并与现场结果进行比较。该过程提供了使用该转向技术的再压裂过程的全周期分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信