Privacy-aware proof-carrying authorization

Matteo Maffei, Kim Pecina
{"title":"Privacy-aware proof-carrying authorization","authors":"Matteo Maffei, Kim Pecina","doi":"10.1145/2166956.2166963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof-carrying authorization (PCA) is one of the most popular approaches for the enforcement of access control policies. In a nutshell, the idea is to formalize a policy as a set of logical rules and to let the requester construct a formal proof showing that she has permissions to access the desired resource according to the provider's policy. This policy may depend on logical formulas that are assumed by other principals in the system. The validity of these formulas is witnessed by digital signatures.\n The usage of digital signatures, however, has a serious drawback, i.e., sensitive data are leaked to the verifier, which severely limits the applicability of PCA. In this paper, we introduce the notion of privacy-aware proof-carrying authorization, an extension of PCA based on a powerful combination of digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge of such signatures. The former are used to witness the validity of logical formulas, the latter to selectively hide sensitive data. Our framework supports a variety of privacy properties, such as data secrecy and user anonymity. We conducted an experimental evaluation to demonstrate the feasibility of our approach.","PeriodicalId":119000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2166956.2166963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Proof-carrying authorization (PCA) is one of the most popular approaches for the enforcement of access control policies. In a nutshell, the idea is to formalize a policy as a set of logical rules and to let the requester construct a formal proof showing that she has permissions to access the desired resource according to the provider's policy. This policy may depend on logical formulas that are assumed by other principals in the system. The validity of these formulas is witnessed by digital signatures. The usage of digital signatures, however, has a serious drawback, i.e., sensitive data are leaked to the verifier, which severely limits the applicability of PCA. In this paper, we introduce the notion of privacy-aware proof-carrying authorization, an extension of PCA based on a powerful combination of digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge of such signatures. The former are used to witness the validity of logical formulas, the latter to selectively hide sensitive data. Our framework supports a variety of privacy properties, such as data secrecy and user anonymity. We conducted an experimental evaluation to demonstrate the feasibility of our approach.
具有隐私意识的携带证明授权
携带证明的授权(PCA)是实施访问控制策略最常用的方法之一。简而言之,其思想是将策略形式化为一组逻辑规则,并让请求者构造一个形式化的证明,表明她具有根据提供者的策略访问所需资源的权限。此策略可能依赖于系统中其他主体所假定的逻辑公式。数字签名证明了这些公式的有效性。然而,数字签名的使用有一个严重的缺点,即敏感数据会泄露给验证者,这严重限制了PCA的适用性。在本文中,我们引入了隐私感知的携带证明授权的概念,这是基于数字签名和此类签名的零知识知识证明的强大组合的PCA的扩展。前者用于证明逻辑公式的有效性,后者用于选择性地隐藏敏感数据。我们的框架支持各种隐私属性,比如数据保密和用户匿名。我们进行了实验评估,以证明我们的方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信