Squandering in Ethic Economics: Consumer and Producer Behaviors Analysis

B. Bidabad
{"title":"Squandering in Ethic Economics: Consumer and Producer Behaviors Analysis","authors":"B. Bidabad","doi":"10.46281/IJIBM.V3I2.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper investigates the effects of squandering on the economic behavior of consumer and firm. Moreover, we analyze consumer work-leisure behavior from the squandering viewpoint. \nFindings: Commodity squandering creates no utility for the consumer. Just the \"(real) consumption (usage)\" satisfies the preference ordering rules of consumer behavior and the \"squandered\" commodities do not satisfy these rules. Definitionally, consumption is equal to \"real usage\" plus \"squandered\" commodities. Thence, the consumer will lose some parts of her utility because of squandering (because of lost resources). The amount of lost income resources due to squandering should be recompensated by more works to preserve the consumer's welfare constant. Squandering effects in total productivity, non-optimal allocation of production factors, product wastage, and product decay are analyzed as less productivity and less supply of products due to squandering. According to this analysis, theoretically, it can be concluded that squandering will decrease the leisure and its corresponding utility of human being. \nSocial implications: If the ethic economics' doctrine affects the consumption pattern, this process will moderate consumption. Otherwise, the society will move toward exploiting all of her capital to: \"just produce-just consume\". The latter will be intensified by knowledge-based economic progress.  \nJEL: D11, D21, Z12, D19, D24 \nDOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402339 \n  \n       ","PeriodicalId":179367,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Business & Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Business & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46281/IJIBM.V3I2.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This paper investigates the effects of squandering on the economic behavior of consumer and firm. Moreover, we analyze consumer work-leisure behavior from the squandering viewpoint. Findings: Commodity squandering creates no utility for the consumer. Just the "(real) consumption (usage)" satisfies the preference ordering rules of consumer behavior and the "squandered" commodities do not satisfy these rules. Definitionally, consumption is equal to "real usage" plus "squandered" commodities. Thence, the consumer will lose some parts of her utility because of squandering (because of lost resources). The amount of lost income resources due to squandering should be recompensated by more works to preserve the consumer's welfare constant. Squandering effects in total productivity, non-optimal allocation of production factors, product wastage, and product decay are analyzed as less productivity and less supply of products due to squandering. According to this analysis, theoretically, it can be concluded that squandering will decrease the leisure and its corresponding utility of human being. Social implications: If the ethic economics' doctrine affects the consumption pattern, this process will moderate consumption. Otherwise, the society will move toward exploiting all of her capital to: "just produce-just consume". The latter will be intensified by knowledge-based economic progress.  JEL: D11, D21, Z12, D19, D24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402339          
道德经济学中的挥霍:消费者和生产者行为分析
目的:研究挥霍行为对消费者和企业经济行为的影响。此外,我们还从挥霍的角度分析了消费者的工作休闲行为。发现:商品浪费对消费者没有任何效用。只有“(实际)消费(使用)”满足消费者行为的偏好排序规则,而“被浪费”的商品不满足这些规则。从定义上说,消费等于“实际使用”加上“浪费”的商品。因此,消费者会因为浪费(因为失去的资源)而失去部分效用。由于浪费而损失的收入资源应该通过更多的工作来补偿,以保持消费者的福利常数。将总生产率的浪费效应、生产要素的非优化配置效应、产品的浪费效应、产品的衰减效应分析为由于浪费导致的生产率下降和产品供给减少。根据这一分析,从理论上可以得出这样的结论:浪费会减少人的闲暇及其相应的效用。社会启示:如果伦理经济学学说影响消费模式,这一过程将对消费起到调节作用。否则,社会将会朝着“只生产——只消费”的方向发展。以知识为基础的经济进步将加强后者。JEL: D11, D21, Z12, D19, D24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402339
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信